Jump to content

Recommended Posts

i think you are now off the idea - but whatever you do, please do NOT bring a side by side double buggy to manhattan! the city is just not that baby friendly and you will struggle on crowded sidewalks and shops with small aisles, plus the natives will have no patience. i'm from NY originally and a friend who is still there who just had a baby made a hilarious observation - she said that NY was so un-baby friendly that people looked at her pushing a baby in a pram like she was wheeling around a bomb in a shopping trolley! that's a little exaggeration, but just accept that it's a busy, crazy city with more people than space.


that said, there are loads of great places to go with kids (all comments posted above are great). definitely get one of the many NY city guides for kids...the advice and tips of the best spots to visit with your bubs will be priceless (just search on amazon for 'new york city guide kids').


have a great time!

I again have to disagree that Manhattan is un-baby friendly. I was there last week and you couldn't move for double buggies. The upper east side (and Brooklyn) is baby central, maybe less so downtown but still plenty of little ones about. it used to be the old standard that people would move out of NYC when they had kids- the clean-up since the early 90s means it is now considered a perfectly acceptable place to raise a family - though finding a good state school or paying fees are just as much of a minefield as in London.

Re: schools. My uncle (lives in manhatten, lucky him) is going through this right now. Sounds worse than school logisitics round here tbh!


Thankyou everyone so much for your replies! We tried out a double maclaren and even a nipper 360 over the weekend but I had so much trouble steering them. It's going to be the p&t, plus a few slings for good measure. I'm going to buy a seat that reclines slightly so we can recline it and pad it out and hope lex is good in it- she's got amazing head control already, so maybe???


We also have a myriad of city guides and books- seb is v excited, mainly for the plane ride. I'm happy that I'm nursing Lex and can't do any toddler wrangling on the plane- now there is a benefit of bf no one tells you about!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...