Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello EDF community


This is just to notify/remind people that the national consultation on walking and cycle safety closes this evening (1 June 2018) at 11:45pm.


if you want to add your views, whether from the perspective of a driver, cyclist, a walker, or all three, this is the link to the consultation:


https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/cycling-and-walking-investment-strategy-cwis-safety-review


If you are going to respond, PLEASE put your time and energy into responding to the consultation itself rather than responding to this EDF post. (This is not an invitation to start a rant on the forum about pedestrians v cyclists v drivers)


Thanks

The consultation is mainly seeking "suggestions" from both members of the public and from organisation. Of course, evidence can also be provided if you want to, but it is not limited to this. For example if you click through to the survey, most of the questions are phrased along the lines: "Do you have any suggestions for ..."


Thanks

  • 1 year later...
Guest qapafu22
Most of the passages are run for the shooting items for the field. Passages of the essay mama discount code are ruined for future items. The number is fixed for all rules. The part is played for the division of the terms. Mounting pressure is done for humans. the statistical expectation for the room for the fur times.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • ok - Jeremy himself is against mandatory vaccines. Is he as extreme as his brother? No? Is it fair to discuss how the overall view of that family would inform Jeremy's response to the pandemic? I would argue very much so    
    • I wonder how much the rebranding is costing in total?  Could the money be used in a better way ? 
    • It's not fair to hold Corbyn's brother's views against him when he has never explicitly or implicitly endorsed them. And he has enough of his own terrible positions to criticise anyway.
    • Completely unacceptable. They need to fund a proper, permanent park warden presence or this sort of behaviour will get worse. Parks should be safe for all to enjoy and being assaulted and threatened by teenage gangs may put more vulnerable people off using the park altogether. If they are prepared to threaten to hurt an animal then where might it lead? Sorry Alice but we'll have to disagree on this one. This does not sound like kids just being silly; lobbing water bombs at each other is one thing, but targeting complete strangers out for a walk and minding their own business and trying to kick their dog is, in my view, no laughing matter. A group of 15 teenagers can be intimidating, not to everyone but for some it can be, especially if their behaviour is aggressive.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...