Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello EDF community


This is just to notify/remind people that the national consultation on walking and cycle safety closes this evening (1 June 2018) at 11:45pm.


if you want to add your views, whether from the perspective of a driver, cyclist, a walker, or all three, this is the link to the consultation:


https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/cycling-and-walking-investment-strategy-cwis-safety-review


If you are going to respond, PLEASE put your time and energy into responding to the consultation itself rather than responding to this EDF post. (This is not an invitation to start a rant on the forum about pedestrians v cyclists v drivers)


Thanks

The consultation is mainly seeking "suggestions" from both members of the public and from organisation. Of course, evidence can also be provided if you want to, but it is not limited to this. For example if you click through to the survey, most of the questions are phrased along the lines: "Do you have any suggestions for ..."


Thanks

  • 1 year later...
Guest qapafu22
Most of the passages are run for the shooting items for the field. Passages of the essay mama discount code are ruined for future items. The number is fixed for all rules. The part is played for the division of the terms. Mounting pressure is done for humans. the statistical expectation for the room for the fur times.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...