Jump to content

Small job for a dynamic nanny. Own children welcome


Recommended Posts

I am urgently looking for a someone able to look after my two multilingual children at my workplaces (East Dulwich/Forest Hill). We speak English, Italian, French, German and Spanish. The position is for around 10-11 hours a week, Mondays to Fridays, 10 weeks a term (30 weeks a year) with a one year contract and immediate start. Pay rate is according to experience.


General description:

You'd have NO household-related tasks whatsoever (cooking, feeding, changing etc). The job merely involves collecting/dropping off my eldest and sitting with my youngest for the short time remaining. I am next door and accessible. My workplaces are suitable for children and full of little ones. You are welcome to bring your own children if you have any or combine other childcare jobs with mine.


More details:

My baby is 9 months old. I'd leave her with you weekdays at around 2:50pm and until 5:20pm or with a slighter later start/earlier finish.


My eldest would also need being collected from school 2-3 days a week (Wednesdays and Fridays, occasionally on Tuesdays). Once picked up, he'd then come with you and his baby sister to my child-friendly work place, to attend some activities while you remain with my youngest only. His school is in Herne Hill. On some Tuesdays, one of his school friends would be making the trip with him, which means that you'd get a second salary from his parents.


Please apply only if genuinely interested or feel free to ask any questions.


Many thanks

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Having enjoyed a day with Sayce HolmesLewis, I understand what you’re saying.  I appreciate your courage responding on here. 
    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...