Jump to content

Recommended Posts

micheljonson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi I am new to this forum i want to know each and

> everything about this forum because i have heard a

> lot about it. but i want to know exact details of

> it.


Hi Michel - perhaps I can help with some key facts.



*The Forum was founded in 1803, by Casper Diddlecott and Barnaby Lemon, two Mormons from Penge - with the help of their fourteen wives.


*During The Great War an entire online generation of young men were lost and - after much deliberation - it was decided that women would be allowed to join. But on 12th March 1919, the day of admission, twenty-six consecutive posts about menstruation and Grazia caused outrage amongst the established male readership - and they were forced to act. 'The Family Room' was duly opened on 13th March 1919.


*There are only 500 registered users, and those on the waiting list must wait for someone to leave before they are allowed in.


*The oldest poster is Sir Keith of Otta, who is 119.


*The Forum is currently funded entirely by Foxtons estate agent, following a misunderstanding with the previous sponsor, Osbald Stennart.



Hope this has all been of some help!!!!! !

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...