Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I chatted to some of the neighbours... apparently the council removed the tree because it died and then a fox dug the hole. The residents don't think a new replacement tree will work out because the pavement is too narrow due to the wheelie bins, which can't go anywhere else because of the way the basement flats are laid out (sad face).


I'm in fairly regular contact with the council tree officers, so I'll let them know about the hole to see if it can be tarmacked over.

In the meantime, I took a photo of the fox hole pit and sent it to the council tree officer and he has now requested for the highways dept to "cap" the pit (which means to tarmac or cement it over) so that no one trips over it.


Can someone let me know when this happens??

I would love trees on the pavements of Ashbourne Grove at the Melbourne Grove end. Sadly the huge trees are going to be cut down when the building works start at 54. It will seem very bare at the bottom end of the road without anything at all.


RCH can you put in a request, how does it work? The wouldn't be able to be planted for a while as yet.

Hi 1921... is this the house on the corner of Ashbourne and Melbourne? I think the trees there are on private property and also have restrictions on chopping them down, but we'll have to see what the planning officers decide.


I think I've seen discussions about allocating funding for street trees along there to compensate, but it may be necessary to wait and see how it goes and then plan accordingly.


I'm just down the road, so let's stay in touch and I'll help you guys negotiate through the system as best I can!

Hi Sue... there are so many layers of complexity to tree replacements, that everything depends on the specifics of the location.


A lot of residents are opting to replace dead trees with smaller species in order to keep the green feel of a road, but without blocking sunlight.


This is actually one of the most fascinating aspects of street tree planting that I enjoy! Shame we didn't know each other back then...


But, depending on the type of tree, you may be able to ask the council to do a crown reduction (a lowering and thinning of the crown) on it, which will help... the only problem with this solution is that it will have to be repeated every few years as the tree grows back, which will incur regular internal budget expenditure...

Update to 1921... I walked round there again and realised that 54 isn't on the corner, but across the road.


I can see exactly what your concerns are... fortunately the pavement is wide enough to accommodate taller tree to replace the internal trees on the property, but the developer may object to the "obstruction".


Let's wait and see what happens as the site gets developed... I haven't seen the planning approval document, but I suspect that the developer will opt to keep at least one internal tree, which will indicate where pavement trees could possibly be planted.

I haven't seen the planning approval document, but I suspect that the developer will opt to keep at least one internal tree,


Depending on the state of the trees here it is quite possible for planners to require all the trees to be kept. It may well not be just up to the developer. Trees, even on private ground, are seen as a public amenity and may well, in some boroughs though not I fear ours, have automatic tree preservation orders on them dependent on their girth.

Hi Sue... Normally birches aren't crown reduced - usually bigger trees such as planes and chestnuts - but we can ask. Ironically, most neighbourhoods tend to chose birches as a "medium" tree specifically because it tends not to block light. But it depends on the angle of the sun and location of the tree.


The best thing is for you to put in a request to the council (I think you can do it via the Environment email link) and I can also try to ask the tree officer in tandem.


Can you PM me the location of the tree, as this could make a difference to the argument?

  • 2 weeks later...

Well.


As of this afternoon, I have been told that the cracks all over my front bay and down the sides of its windows are due to subsidence and are "100%" due to the Birch street tree outside my house.


Somebody will shortly be coming along and investigating re the roots.


So I imagine the tree will have to be removed.


So the blocking out of the sun is now the least of my problems :(


I gather similar cases are arising all over this area, following the heat wave :(

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm, the heatwave makes it sound more like

> cracking in the subsoil and below due to the

> moisture content decreasing ? which is the cause

> of most London subsidence. And birch roots are

> very shallow. Further investigation need, I think.



The guy I spoke to on the phone was going on a video which somebody who came last week made, inside and outside, so they are coming to investigate further (digging down to the tree roots).


The video maker told me it was highly unlikely to be the tree because neither of the adjoining houses has similar cracks.


However today's person (can't remember whether he said he was a structural surveyor or a structural engineer) said that the tree roots would have drawn the moisture out of the soil. He said the person who made the video was a technician and implied that his own view was superior to the technician's opinion.


My main concern is that the cracks are getting wider and I'm worried the windows may fall out :( Because of the number of claims due to the heatwave, things are taking longer to investigate and resolve.


The guy said I may have to have the front of the house propped up temporarily, AAAAAAARRRRRGGGGGGHHHHH :(:( :(


ETA: Anyway, they are sending me a letter which may (or may not) shed more light.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is possible that the foundations of the bay are

> not so deep as to those of the house.

>

> May not be as serious as it looks. ???

> But the bay will still need to be rebuilt.



Yes the foundations of the bay are different. That's why only the bay is affected, presumably.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sophie, I have to thank you for bringing me squarely into 2025.  I was aware of 4G/5G USB dongles for single computers, and of being able to use smartphones for tethering 4G/5G, but hadn't realised that the four mobile networks were now providing home hub/routers, effectively mimicking the cabled broadband suppliers.  I'd personally stick to calling the mobile networks 4G/5G rather than wifi, so as not to confuse them with the wifi that we use within home or from external wifi hotspots. 4G/5G is a whole diffferent, wide-area set of  networks, and uses its own distinct wavebands. So, when you're saying wi-fi, I assume you're actually referring to the wide-area networks, and that it's not a matter of just having poor connections within your home local area network, or a router which is deficient.   If any doubt, the best test will be with a computer connected directly to the router by cable; possibly  trying different locations as well. Which really leaves me with only one maybe useful thing to say.  :) The Which pages at https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/broadband/article/what-is-broadband/what-is-4g-broadband-aUWwk1O9J0cW look pretty useful and informative. They include local area quality of coverage maps for the four providers (including 5G user reports I think) , where they say (and I guess it too is pretty common knowledge): Our survey of the best and worst UK mobile networks found that the most common issues mobile customers have are constantly poor phone signal and continuous brief network dropouts – and in fact no network in our survey received a five star rating for network reliability. 
    • 5G has a shorter range and is worse at penetrating obstacles between you and the cell tower, try logging into the router and knocking it back to 4G (LTE) You also need to establish if the problem is WiFi or cellular. Change the WiFi from 5GHz to 2.4GHz and you will get better WiFi coverage within your house If your WiFi is fine and moving to 4G doesn't help then you might be in a dead spot. There's lots of fibre deployed in East Dulwich
    • Weve used EE for the past 6 years. We're next to Peckham Rye. It's consistent and we've never had any outages or technical issues. We watch live streams for football and suffer no lags or buffering.   All the best.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...