Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I'm in the area about two weeks and am attempting to get one of my girls into a school close to where we now live (Near Bellenden Road). Bellenden Road, St. John and St. Clements, Goose Green, St. James the Great, The Villa. Plenty on offer and I'm aware of the various Ofsted reports, but I have a healthy disregard for official figures and statistics, and would be interested to hear what kind of experiences and advice the forum could offer. Many thanks in advance. Aido

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2023-primary-schools/
Share on other sites

This topic has been discussed on lot in the past on the forum so it would be worth your while doing a search and finding the other threads where is has been discussed. As I've said in the past on other threads, I'll be sending my boy to Goose Green Primary - I've been to visit the school and been quite impressed with it. A friend sends her 10 year old there and she has had a really good experience of the school and her daughter has done very well. They have an on-site afterschool and breakfast club which is good and lots of after school activities like drama and music. 10 years ago it had a dreadful reputation and was a Fresh Start School. A new head (who is still there) and new staff team. It's since risen quite alot and now has a fairly good reputation - while local middle class parents just to shun it, you see more and more of the middle classes sending their kids there. My partner's friend is a supply teacher and has taught in that school and says it has a good spirt. His main criticism is that alot of the equipment is abit dated and scruffy. But I've heard alot of Southwark primary schools have that problem. St Johns and St. Clements is a church school but will take 50% of the intake from non-church goers each year which I think means there are 15 places a year for non-church attenders. It's quite difficult to get in there I believe. But it is a good school so if you live nearby you could have a go!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi all The EDF summary email is currently sent on Sunday to inform me of everything relevant for the weekend I've now missed.   Would anyone else find it useful to have the notification sent on Thursday or Friday instead?  David
    • Bit nerdy. But the traditional form of England/Wales local government was based on committees with themehmbers in proportion to the respective political parties numbers.  Blair government introduced for councils that chose it cabinet structure where the majority hold roles covering each of  former committee would decide/confirm. Additionally a Blair option for a super council leader Mayoral role such as Lewisham rather than ceremonial mayoral role who chairs council Council Assemblies of all councils. A number of councils have since moved from exec Mayoral role to cabinet basis.  Without Councillors being elected via a Proportional Voting system I personally would prefer to see a return to committee decision making structure. It ensures all Councillors have to know what they're doing rather than the ruling party leaving it to a few cabinet members and the rest just voting at Council Assemblies how they/re told. Just a personal view. 
    • With the elections coming up soon, it's interesting to note that residents over the boundary in Lewisham have a different system of local government than Southwark. Lewisham has a directly elected Executive Mayor while Southwark has kept a traditional local authority structure. Nothing is perfect, but I think Lewisham made a mistake with the Executive Mayor in that it blurs the legislative branch and executive branch of governance, and makes serious scrutiny of decisions less likely to happen - especially in a Borough like Lewisham which is essentially a one-party state. None of the political parties are offering any major reforms of local government for London, which is very disappointing since it seems obvious that having 33 local authorities - all with their own internal administrations - is not a good way to run things, when most of them are struggling even to maintain basic services.
    • My  understanding is that all developments whatever size, have to have an element of social housing…affordable housing… council housing..No longer sure of percentage but clearly less than years ago.. The point is house builders clearly make a profit or they simply would not  continue building what I refer to as modern  boxes!  Putting housing condensed or what originally was one house with land attached.  Huge development going on in Beckenham - 200 social housing and rest open market.. sited over several houses now demolished… up the road from the park on way into town centre.. might even be completed by now.. haven’t been that way in last year… certainly can’t miss it.. So, for example, let’s say a developer builds houses and flats on a site… social housing I assume would be in a separate block to other flats and I assume house as well. Ie to put it bluntly, away from main site.. Nothing wrong in that at all.  Many years ago, near Borough a developer built flats divided into blocks. . Price range £300/400,000. Social housing was in a different block…. Can’t remember how many… so families , couples etc got a brand new flat with modern kitchen and bathrooms, flooring etc  and could not even keep common parts clean.. trash thrown out and left including out of windows etc..total disregard for community and certainly not  grateful for brand new property and a home.. I hasten to add, not every flat in the social housing sector but certainly a fair few behaved that way.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...