Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is worth a read, though I do post with the caveat that it is a Daily Mail article, so apologies for that;


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2050239/How-washing-machines-familys-health-risk-Low-temperatures-mixed-loads-spreading-dangerous-bugs.html


I don't think this is cause for panic, but I do think it is worth bearing in mind that some items - towels, bedding maybe, and certainly cloth nappies (I have to include those, don't I)! and certain clothes depending what they have been exposed to, should be washed at 60 degrees.


The article mentions Nappisan, but remember this can be very damaging to modern shaped nappies, items with elastic, velcro or any bamboo fabrics so is best avoided, other than on flat terry squares, towels etc.


Most of our washing is done at 30 degrees, but I still wash towels and bedding at higher temps. What about everyone else?

There is also this, which is what I always told people about in my nappy demos;


"Many consumers believe biological detergents are harsher on sensitive skin, but a study published in the British Journal Of Dermatology found little evidence for this."


Because the non-bios contain bleach, whilst the bios contain enzymes, and actually both can be equally aggressive on the skin. What is relevant is how much detergent you use in each wash, and what you/your family happens to be sensitive to. There is no non-bio detergent in most of Europe and no higher incidence of skin sensitivity or eczema.


Food for thought!


Molly

I also wash towels and bedding at 60C and the rest at 30 or 40 depending on stains. I do think the actual risk of catching something dangerous through a laundry that you won't catch through normal contact within a family is probably very small. If norovirus only spread through contact with poo we wouldn't all get it so easily although I understand that you may want to exclude as much risk as possible with a newborn or somebody of weak overall health. Good point about the hygiene of the washing machine itself though!
Hi, I wash towels, bedding and Muslins at 60, clothing at 40 unless it's a small load which takes 40 mins but at 30degrees. If you constantly wash at 30 and 40 bacteria builds up in your rubber seal! Once a month do a 90degree cycle but with nothing in the machine, just powder/tablet, whatever you use.

Very interesting - but based on the advice here, I'm going to be doing about 8 separate washes a week, and will end up with very small smalls if I put them in on 60 degrees!!


I do wash bedding and towels at 60 though, and occasionally run a 90 degree wash through, with some vinegar as I was told an old trick years ago that the acid in that helps to desolve (TMI alert) body fats from the machine. Eeewww.

Oh and I think another old wive's tip is that ironing also serves a purpose other than neatness. The hot iron helps to get rid of those nasty little bugs.


With all the non-iron stuff now I know I get away with far less ironing than my mum would be pleased with! :-)

I've always thought that the concept of washing at low temps to be environmentally friendly is actually a marketing ploy to get you to buy new detergents. The heat and energy used to make these fancy new detergents is probably more than what you save by doing low temp washes.


I prefer to wash in hotter water with less detergent. When clothes can't be washed warm/hot, I tend to soak or wash them longer. And I hate, really HATE, when I've just washed my hands and dried them, only to find there's a slight mildew smell from the 'clean' towel!!!! If that ever happens around here, it's straight in a 90 C wash I'm afraid.

I tend to do sheets and towels at 60 and everything else at 30 - it seemed like common sense to me that the things that were most likely to be in prolonged and reasonably intimate contact with us would need a bit of sanitisation. Good to know that it was a logical decision! :)

Yay! "Researchers found the only way to eradicate the bacterium (Staphylococcus aureus) was with temperatures of 40c and above combined with a detergent containing bleach."


I've continued using non-bio for my eczema ridden lot despite knowing about the dermatological research but always wondered if it was maybe just my imagination that it appeared to make a difference to husband and itchy small. But that explains it. Staph A is a real problem for A and her dad, as it is for many with eczema, so the beneficial effects of the bleach in the non-bio dealing with the Staph obviously override whatever irritation it causes. Won't be the same for everyone of course, but it appears to work for us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...