Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As nice as this would be, I doubt that Admin would have the time/resources to do this. For now I think we'll have to make do with one Family Room - it wasn't that long ago that we were lumped in with the main discussion boards, thank goodness we got a separate room!

I have wondered about this myself (as a parent of teens, but with a professional interest in new baby stuff), but I can see that it'd be more admin work. We're a victim of our own success really. I wonder why the forum format works so well here in ED, but less well in other seemingly similar places?


A whole other thread I know . . .

If you're not particularly interested in a thread or you don't feel it's relevant to you don't have to click on it, after all?


I don't think we really need different sections for different ages, we can all exercise our own choice over which threads we open surely? I don't often open ones about secondary school admissions, for example, (apart from to scare myself) as my little one is still a baby, but I'm glad they're there, so I can dip in when I want to.


And as Otta says, sometimes it's incredibly useful for people with younger babies to have advice and hear the stories of those with older children, that's part of the joy of the family room!

Family Room Moderator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As nice as this would be, I doubt that Admin would

> have the time/resources to do this. For now I

> think we'll have to make do with one Family Room -

> it wasn't that long ago that we were lumped in

> with the main discussion boards, thank goodness we

> got a separate room!


Thought it might be a long shot Admin but thanks for your reply.


I don't think that parents of older children would stop reading and offering advice for those with younger kids if there was a separate section and equally, parents of younger children could still 'scare' themselves with the long journey ahead by reading about problems experienced by those with older children. Perhaps we just need to bump posts about older children a little so they don't get drowned out to Page 2 too quickly.



Anyway, no use debating this any longer as Admin has spoken!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Let's not forget this is the lowest level of local politics. If McCash really thought his defection could trash the Labour Party nationally, and it was loaded with invective and exhibitionism, then that's pretty much the definition of a "hissy fit"! Scooping the Green nomination for DaWN constituency is also going to be a lot harder for a Marxist arriviste than you suggest. There may be a wave of new, younger Polanski-ites that have joined the Green Party of E&W recently, but it's the long-standing, often retired members of the Party that tend to participate in candidate interview panels and bother voting in selections...
    • They've had 26 years or so of trading, and if anyone deserves decent retirement... In my view they're going out at the top. It's clearly being sold, assuming it all goes through as a very more more than just a going concern. 
    • I had heard this was on the cards a while ago, sad, the end of an era, but well done Rod and Tim for stewarding a beacon of excellence for so many years.    
    • Both your hopes will be fine, I think. Our waitress will stay on. The downstairs is getting refurbished, and the bar area enlarged, presumably by removing that awkward little 'lobby' by the loos.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...