Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There also seems to be another Harris School too - is it Peckham Park. Can you explain at all Renata what the link is between the two? The Primary School book seems to indicate some link but it's not totally clear. It also raises the question as to whether Harris secondaries will then give priority to kids from the Harris primaries.


I know they do seem to be doing a lot of good work in bringing up the local schools but is anyone else a little wary as to the number of local schools being run by Harris? Part of me thinks, if they're performing better than before, it's all good but I can't help but worry when one player gets too active in any one market.

Free schools and Academies have the same status in law, they are both under the "Academy" umbrella. They are all schools funded by the state and they are outside of local authority control.


Free schools- these are new state schools, they may be set up by parents, teachers, educational charities, community groups etc. The school must form a not-for-profit charity. They have a direct contract with the Government. They submit a proposal and business case to the Government. They receive their funding directly from the Government.


Typical Academies are current state schools that opt out of Local Authority control and the also become directly funded by the Government. They also must form a not-for-profit charity. They have a direct contract with the Government. They usually have an established charitable trust as a sponsor.


Academies/Free schools set their own admissions policies which may be different to those of local authority schools (eg Harris secondaries have their own banding exam), so I can't comment on admissions policy of Harris primaries to secondaries.


Both schools are being sponsored by the Harris Federation

Renata

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Today we are seeing the impact of increased taxes (employers NI) with tje UK unemployment rate rising  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxrp7znkdlo Unfortunately, to increase tax burdens will see the economy stall or a recession, as Angelina says, cutting spending, whilst painful short term, is a good way to bring down government borrowing.  True, we don't want to see cuts to services but there are other areas of government spending that can be reduced and with AI impacting all jobs across all businesses, maybe it will also reduce overall staffing costs. 
    • or cut costs.  The cost of debt is a huge burden, it cannot be increased.
    • Yes, they should clearly have been more honest on taxes before the election and not backed themselves into a corner. After 14 years of mismanagement and decline, they have to invest and at the same time start to bring borrowing down (otherwise they continues to be at the mercy of the bond markets). Continued cuts / degrading of public services is counter productive (a successful economy and society needs good infrastructure, education and health care).  The single biggest thing they could do to immediately improve growth would be to rejoin the single market, but I appreciate that is difficult politically.  So if you can't significantly boost growth short term, can't cut too much further, and need to raise money without borrowing, that only really leaves taxation.    Of course, where best to target those taxes - that's the real question.
    • Need moving boxes for house move - all sizes / shapes and bubble wrap too if available. Can collect asap. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...