Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We have any opporutnity to reengineer / refine the way that capitalism is currently structured for the better


What is this opportunity of which you speak? What re-engineering are you proposing? What refinements would work?


Sitting in a tent near St Pauls doesn't seem to have achieved very much - except to undermine the quality of life of Londoners working and travelling in the area - and sending out the wrong message to potential tourists.


If people wish to engage in political dialogue - fine, make a speech, set up a political party, write an article. Squatting isn't dialogue - as Ian Hislop has pointed out all the St Pauls camp has actually achieved is the departure / dismissal of two or three rather woolly minded clerics.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unregulated capitalism has seriously undermined global well being and democracy. The 'Occupy'

> movement is attempting to encourage a debate on how we organise our society and economy in light

> of the global economic crisis. This thread would suggest that they are going someway to achieving

> this aim. It is hardly fair to criticise them for not providing easy answers.


The Occupy protests remind me a little of the standard Hollywood prostitute scene:


Man: What's your name?

Woman: What do you want it to be?


The people taking part in the Occupy protests has wildly varying reasons for being there, and it seems all of the supporters are happy to read that their particular bugbear is the one that is at the heart of the protest. If I was being kind, I'd say it was a dazzling case of brilliant marketing.


For those of us a little more questioning, it still comes down to 'What do they want?' and that, it seems, is the number one question they don't seem to have an answer for. Whatever, the answer sure as hell does not seem to be 'a debate'.

> What is this opportunity of which you speak? What

> re-engineering are you proposing? What refinements

> would work?


There is a general feeling that the deregulation of the financial industry has seriously backfired. A consensus that the system needs to change and this could act as a catalyst for change. To suggest regulation of the financial markets has been politically difficult, but the crisis has presented an opportunity.


In terms of re-engineering the system, clearly this needs to be looked at very carefully and needs to follow a full, public debate. But, basically, it needs to ensure that markets are more balanced, that they deliver outcomes that are for the benefit of more than a small minority and that they incentivise efficient and value adding activities.


> Sitting in a tent near St Pauls doesn't seem to

> have achieved very much - except to undermine the

> quality of life of Londoners working and

> travelling in the area - and sending out the wrong

> message to potential tourists.


It's created a debate and it's kept some of the issues surrounding the financial crash at the top of the news agenda. It is important that the rightous indignation that followed in the immediate aftermath of the crisis doesn't fade and allow us to return to business as usual IMO.


> If people wish to engage in political dialogue -

> fine, make a speech, set up a political party,

> write an article. Squatting isn't dialogue - as

> Ian Hislop has pointed out all the St Pauls camp

> has actually achieved is the departure / dismissal

> of two or three rather woolly minded clerics.


For better or worse, the actions of the camp have actually done more to raise their profile and propogate their grievances than an letter to their MP would ever have done.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unregulated capitalism? What, as in... no

> regulation?

>

> Surely we do have plenty of regulation. The

> discussion we need is about what additional regs

> we need to protect our society. Not a load of

> cliched vagaries.


OK, so you could say inadequately regulated capitalism, it amounts to the same point. Primarilly though the issue is about financial markets which have very little regulation indeed.

"In terms of re-engineering the system, clearly this needs to be looked at very carefully and needs to follow a full, public debate. But, basically, it needs to ensure that markets are more balanced, that they deliver outcomes that are for the benefit of more than a small minority...."


Fine words, but what does this actually mean? What does a balanced market look like, and how do you regulate to achieve it? Delivering outcomes are what (in modern speak) organisations do, but markets are not single entities - they are messy bunches of transactions involving lots of different individuals and organisations.


I looked at the Occupied Times, and it's a none too impressive. I'm trying not to be too harsh but touchy-feely pseudo New Age bullshit will not take anybody any closer to understanding, let alone dealing with the genuinely complicated issues that the current economic situation has thrown up.

There are a number of very dubious practices which need regulating. Closing down so called vulture funds for example. restricting short selling for another. I posted this on another thread, but Professor Robert Frank recently presented a really good lecturer to an audience at the LSE which also outlined some interesting ideas on how one can reduce wasteful activities based on positional competition.

The current crisis has exposed some serious faults in the current system. It's not good enough to say it's too difficult a subject to think about so lets carry on as before.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I looked at the Occupied Times, and it's a none

> too impressive. I'm trying not to be too harsh but

> touchy-feely pseudo New Age bullshit will not take

> anybody any closer to understanding, let alone

> dealing with the genuinely complicated issues that

> the current economic situation has thrown up.


There is no doubt that the Occupy movement is a fairly disparate group. It's a bit incoherent, but for better or worse, it takes something controvercial and inconvenient like the camp to keep the issue live. Prior to their appearance, we were in very real danger of the debate fading from public attention.

What has actually changed as a result of the financial crisis in terms of how we regulate markets. Very little indeed. There is nothing to stop the same thing happening again? In fact I see only yesterday that the government are encouraging 95% mortgages again.

Totally agree that the solution to this mess lies in effective regulation, but to say that financial markets have very little regulation is completely untrue. As for short-selling... it's an essential tool of risk management, and I'm not convinced there's an effective way to ban "naked" shorting.

"The current crisis has exposed some serious faults in the current system. It's not good enough to say it's too difficult a subject to think about so lets carry on as before."



That's not what I'm saying. What I am saying is these are not camping-protest type issues. This not Greenham Common - say no to nukes! This is "how do you incentivise institutional investors to be more interventionist in the companies that they own to improve corporate governance and long-term planning?" "How do you regulate OTC derivatives trading to achieve robust risk pricing without stifling genuine creativity in capital markets?" Call me a cynic but I doubt I am going to get interesting answers to those questions from a moonlighting social worker in Peruvian knitwear.

http://www.economicvoice.com/occupy-london-makes-ubs-building-into-bank-of-ideas/50025817#axzz1eSz77Zrv


Occupy Londons website

"The centre was opened on Saturday morning as the ?Bank of Ideas?, with activists promising to make space available for those that have lost their nurseries, community centres and youth clubs to Government spending cuts."


Why not use a building thats standing empty, pity the goverment couldn't come up with ideas like this.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We do. People from all over the world can read

> this forum.


Was thinking the same Brendan.


Jeremy This is not a new concept, theres loads of squats, social centres been offering there spaces to be used.

If parents want to take up this offer, and create something different, obviously there are some who would find the idea

absurd, regardless of this building lying empty over two years. What would you like to see happen with this space or would you rather it lay empty.

I suppose such action (self help. Urseries, schools etc) could be considered as an example of the "Big Society" and people doing things for themselves, rather than expecting a paternalistic government to provide for every want using money it doesn't have.

Doesn't a nursery need staff (who have had the appropriate training and safety checks)? Does the building have heating, electricity and plumbing? Is it a clean, safe environment for young children? Get real!!


I don't mind them squatting an unused building (I believe it's earmarked for demolition, along with much of the Broadgate estate). But to pretend it's for the good of the greater community is plainly ridiculous.

Everyone should feel safe and welcome in the Bank. Our Safer Spaces Policy asks people to be mindful and respectful of how their ideas or actions might effect others, and there is a No Drugs and Alcohol Policy. As this is a public space any damage or disrespect to the property would be an act of disrespect and violence towards your own community, a community trying to come together to find positive solutions to our current crises. We ask all people who come into the space to come in with respect.


Above of there website here http://www.bankofideas.org.uk/


This may be hard for you to understand Jeremy, but not all parents are happy with education, many home educating.

Nor does everyone feel there children are safe in school.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Nothing to do with the tories overspending whatsoever eh! Blame the last 10/11 years of blatant mismanagement, incompetence and willful deceit on the poor bastards that were left with the fall out of a complete car crash tory government.   One PM after another falling on their sword. Open corruption and piss taking throughout covid and a legacy of huge debt and destruction yet in your view it will be labour's 4 years in power that bankrupts us in 2029.  Another one that must think people are blind and stupid.  Rejoice rejoice. It's a pity he and his fellow clowns were completely annihilated at the ballot box. I mean they were doing so well after all 🙃🙃
    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...