Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Today sat in traffic tights near East Dulwich Grove and Townley Road, the guy in the car in front of me dangled a plastic bottle out of the window for 5 mins before throwing it into the road. It was one of those situations where he appeared to be weighing it up (toying with me?) before eventually doing the inevitable.


Obviously a tosser in at least 2 and presumably all 3 senses of the word...


So what to do. Options going through my mind at the time:


a) Pick it up and throw it back through his open window

b) Make a note of his number plate and start a naming and shaming thread (ooh scary) or report to someone (who?)

c) Seeth with rage but do nothing

d) Hit the accelerator and ram his car hard from behind


Luckily the wife was with me and talked me down from a few of these, so now I am sat here still a bit cross wondering what to do with his number plate details...


Thoughts?

Difficult.


I too have a problem with this sort of thing. My main one is people on the phone whilst driving. I want to buy a set of blue strobe lights that can be put in the windscreen when I see someone doing it, just to frighten the shite out of them, however I suspect this is highly illegal. I have shouted at a few people as I have driven past them whilst they are on the phone but what I tend to do now is give a long blast on the horn as I drive past them.


With regards to the water bottle incident SC mentioned, I would have picked it up and put it back through his window gently saying 'I think you dropped this accidentaly', just to see what he said.

Interesting OP.

I struggle with this aswell. Re. People dropping litter I usually don't have the balls to confront them, wish I did. Re. Bigger things like what I saw this morning (lads smashing bottles in the street) or bikes being stolen, I call the ED safer neighbourhood team or 101 to report it to the police. I think we all need to take responsibility and confront / report more. Also police funding is allocated to areas where crimes are reported, so if you don't report it nothing changes.

Tom

Confront them if you are reasonably sure you won't get a smack in the chops, or worse. I do it often and have not had anything more than unimaginative and repetitive back-chat. The last time was on the 40, near to CPR: a woman chucked stuff from the window on the lower deck, so I said to her 'please don't do that'. She could only respond with 'shut up' which she repeated about twenty times! I pointed out that her anger was a sure sign that she knew she'd done wrong and that I was not in the least bit embarrassed about pulling her up over it in public.

ibilly99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Since a burglar with a phone was found by the cops

> under a car and let off I suspect telling the

> authorities will be met with incomprehension so I

> would go for a or d.


xxxxxxxx


It's not true to say he was "let off", if you are implying that the police should have done more than they did.


The CPS wouldn't prosecute because they didn't think there was sufficient chance of getting a conviction. There was no evidence, or insufficient evidence, to prove that the person under the car had stolen the phone, even though it was not his phone.


Circumstantial evidence is not enough in a case like this.


There is a long discussion of this incident in another thread - which presumably you have read.

In Southwark Community wardens hand out ?50 fines to those they see dropping litter, but no good when it comes to people in cars obviously. I've confronted people for dropping litter within easy distance of a bin but if they reply with a mouthful there's not a lot you can do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...