Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Red Ken makes a point that accords with what I'vbe long suspected, the relocation thing is an empty threat to manipulate cowardly, self-serving politicians.


because I have been around for a long time, I've also learned how much of what you are told is bulllshit. And when I hear so many people in the City say they're all going to go [because of higher taxes], the simple fact is we really only have one rival, and that is New York. You are not going to have major banks in the City relocate to Shanghai because there's a degree of political uncertainty, perhaps decades ahead. They are not going to Frankfurt because young men want to go out on the pull and do a load of cocaine and they can't really do that easily in Frankfurt.


I also suspect the corollary to the threat is that the desired behaviour will result in a nice directorship when you're done with all this tedious public service nonsense.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Red Ken makes a point that accords with what I'vbe

> long suspected, the relocation thing is an empty

> threat to manipulate cowardly, self-serving

> politicians.

>

> They are not going to Frankfurt because young men

> want to go out on the pull and do a load of

> cocaine and they can't really do that easily in

> Frankfurt.

>


As out of touch as ever our Ken:-


Frankfurt has designated the area around the Hauptbahnhof for the sex trade and illegal drugs. Junkies can take, but not sell, drugs, and clean needles are distributed. In all likelihood you will see drug use during your visit, but the police and private security patrols help to keep things under control. The crime rate in these areas is low as it is in the rest of the city.




Red Light Frankfurt


...and London's red light district and drug zones are located...?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a case of investors will abandon us rather

> than bankers moving offshore. Its the investments

> that suffer the tax and these will go elsewhere,

> leaving us with too many bankers.

>


Not necessarily. One of the things a transaction tax might curb is high-frequency trading. That's currently one of our exchange's selling points, and it allows institutions to build very quick computers to arbitrage tiny price differences in nanoseconds. This comes in for some criticism as it substantially distorts trading volumes and effectively skims the potential gains of 'real' investors, by buying and selling immediately before they buy (thus 'normalizing' the price upwards) or vice versa before the sell.


The argument for it is that it 'curbs volatility', thus protecting investors from uncertainty and distorion. The argument against it is that it's a risk-free way of gaming the market without any intention to invest in anything for longer than milliseconds, and amounts to nothing more than a bank-imposed transaction tax on everyone else.


To my mind, if investors were going to be put off investing by the a tiny tax, they'd have gone already, assuming they knew how it works. If a new transaction tax is set at the right level, and makes the high-frequency scams unviable, then proper investors shouldn't notice any difference.

It might, Burbage. The problem is, I don't believe the rates being touted have been set with that in mind - they have been set to achieve a (rather mythical) magic number, generally in the tens to hundreds of billions, that somehow manages to solve any and all problems you can think of - generally all at once. The original website for the Robin Hood tax campaign laughingly said the proceeds of the tax would go to 'good causes', thus making everyone believe their pet issue would suddenly have a limitless amount of money to throw at. The deficit, the NHS, poverty, climate change, overseas aid, world peace - there seems nothing this wondrous tax won't solve.


But, as been said before, the biggest problem with it is that, unless it is set globally, it just won't work. If they go ahead, France will make for a very interesting test case.

Burbage Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> high-frequency trading. ... effectively skims the

> potential gains of 'real' investors, by buying and

> selling immediately before they buy (thus 'normalizing'

> the price upwards) or vice versa before the sell.


What you describe sounds like a type of fraud called 'front running' that is occasionally committed by market makers and prime brokers.


A properly constructed HFT algorithm does not engage in any illegal activity.


> The argument against it is that it's a

> risk-free way of gaming the market without any

> intention to invest in anything for longer than

> milliseconds ...


The majority of HFT positions are indistinguishable from those of a typical day trader - very, very few are held for ?milliseconds?. In order for an HFT position to be profitable, the difference between the opening and closing prices must exceed the bid?offer spread twice and the day-trade commission (if applicable) and the exchange fees AND realise a positive profit margin. They are also subject to any applicable uptick rules.


The same consideration applies to an arbitrage-seeking intra-market HFT system with the additional burden of having to pay two sets of commissions and exchange fees and to compensate for currency exchange rate movements.


High frequency trading is not risk-free; it is a high risk strategy. There is no free lunch!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...