Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Currently in a very happy nanny share which will come to an end in a few months time as I will be on maternity leave with No.2. Thinking ahead to when I will go back to work next autumn, wanted to hear stories of how nanny shares might work under our new circumstances.


Older son will be 3 when I return to work and we would like him in a nursery for at least 2/3 half day sessions a week or 2 full days. Junior will be 8months. Ideally, we would have a sole charge nanny on our own but by the time I have paid for nanny's salary, tax and other expenses plus nursery cost, I really will be paying to go back to work.


Also, having done a share, it's wonderful for the kids to have a playmate and I would love to do a share again. I guess it could be a share with another toddler at nursery part time or with a younger one of similar age to our younger one.


Does anyone have any experience they could share? I thought child care for 1 was tough enough but two makes it mind boggling!

I'm sure it's possible but I'd worry a bit about safety. Two on scooters, one in a buggy, what if one falls and the other isn't a great listener and you're just near a big junction. Or at a playground, how is not at least one of them going to end up with a swing against his teeth. I'm sure childminders do it all the time and there are plenty of mums with twins and toddlers combined so I guess I'm just a "bit" of a control freak!

My only experience is that I considered a similar childcare solution and decided against it for this reason but again, I know I'm quite obsessive :-$

if one child is under one and the other two are 2/3 3/4 i cant see the problem ive been a childminder for years and i find is easier when they have other children to play with also regards the scooter accident that can happen with just one child your not going to stop them falling or haveing minor bumps and grazes dont all children

plenty of people have three young children and manage. including twins plus newborn, etc.


We are contemplating something similar, though there will only be a few months that I'm back at work and need care for infant daughter before my son and his current nanny share buddy start school. That child will likely have to drop out for geographic reasons but I imagine we'll try to find another baby my daughter's age or another school starter whose parents want after-school care.


we're keeping our(3-day/week) share going during my mat leave ... think i'd have to send the baby back otherwise

I'd have thought that a nanny (like any mother) would herd the children a bit closer together when crossing roads, or might make kids travel by buggy where a solo toddler might have been able to scoot. It's easy to imagine dreadful situations and speculate how they would be dealt with but a good nanny should be as good and careful as you would be yourself. Kids tend to listen to their nannies more than to their parents anyway (so galling!).


Our nanny currently looks after 2 one-year-old babies and our schoolboy during holidays. It's hard work for her, but the older child can help out. It's early days but so far it is working OK. Another 6 months and I think it will get easier, with 3 bipeds and only one nap/day for the babies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...