Things taht in all honesty you're not that bothered about...

[red devil]

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did anyone else initially mis-read the previous

> post?

Yes, and my eyes are still streamimg...::o

[the-e-dealer]

Is that anything to do with Carling Black Label - Because I don't care about that either!

[Claudia Drezner]

Birthdays (my own).

Winning the lottery.

St. Stephen Lawrence.

[the-e-dealer]

Was he a Saint?

[Otta]

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did anyone else initially mis-read the previous

> post?

Yep.

[Otta]

Claudia Drezner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Birthdays (my own).

>

> Winning the lottery.

>

> St. Stephen Lawrence.

Surely too obvious, you're losing your touch. And when you have to scrape the bottom of the barrel by using racism for your trolling kicks, perhaps it's time to take it to another forum, where you can use your old material.

[Claudia Drezner]

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Was he a Saint?

You'd think so the way the media's gone about it! I'm tired of the whole saga.

[Claudia Drezner]

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Claudia Drezner Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Birthdays (my own).

> >

> > Winning the lottery.

> >

> > St. Stephen Lawrence.

>

>

> Surely too obvious, you're losing your touch. And

> when you have to scrape the bottom of the barrel

> by using racism for your trolling kicks, perhaps

> it's time to take it to another forum, where you

> can use your old material.

How on earth is that racism, or is that your stock rebuttal to anything you don't like? I'm just outraged that we've dispensed with our double jeopardy law on the back of the St. Stephen Lawrence inquiry.

Seriously, you aren't very smart.

[DJKillaQueen]

An innocent young man was murdered and his killers were never brought to justice. In what way was any of that his fault to make you so tired of it? Really bad form CD.

[the-e-dealer]

I suppose saying you are not bothered about a young man who beaten to death by thugs in London does show a sad disconnect.

[Claudia Drezner]

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An innocent young man was murdered and his killers

> were never brought to justice. In what way was any

> of that his fault to make you so tired of it?

> Really bad form CD.

Who's saying that it's the fault of the deceased? I'm not. Dobson and Norris were found not guilty, yet after we did away with our double jeopardy laws (on the strength of the inquiry), they're back in the dock. It stinks!

[hellosailor]

Claudia Drezner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Dobson and Norris were found not guilty,

> yet after we did away with our double jeopardy

> laws (on the strength of the inquiry), they're

> back in the dock. It stinks!

Geez you're boring AND creepy 'Claudia'. scamper along now why don't you

[DJKillaQueen]

But aren't they back because of new evidence? And surely if they are guilty then they should be convicted?

[Otta]

The double jeopardy laws were a nonsense, and fortunately this case brought that to light.

But don't try to tell us that you're all upset about a change in the law. You mentioned Steven Lawrence in this thread, and added the "St" bit, simply to get a rise.

I sent you a PM yesterday, which you've ignored, and I give up trying to reason with someone who just gets such a thrill from winding people up, and who will use ANY subject to do so

You are a sad sad little human, and I'm giving up pointing it out

I may not be smart, but when you're banned (again), I'll still be here, sharing my non smart opinions, whilst you're in your bedroom plotting your next really interesting move.

Say what you like in response, I promise I won't reply.

[Claudia Drezner]

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But aren't they back because of new evidence? And

> surely if they are guilty then they should be

> convicted?

They were acquitted of all charges! Hence, they aren't guilty. Although I'm beginning to think that they'll be hauled in front of a judge until the government/judiciary get the verdict they want!

[El Pibe]

Seriously 'claudia' or Lawrence.

Give it a rest.

It's actually quite pathetic, not a little tragic and if truth be told a little bit alarming.

If it's a cry for help then I genuinely suggest you go to your GP and get a referral to a mental health prefessional for depression ... and lay off the weed for a while too.

[Claudia Drezner]

*Yawn*

[the-e-dealer]

Yes put it to sleep!

[hellosailor]

Claudia Drezner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> They were acquitted of all charges! Hence, they

> aren't guilty.

Aaaaaawwww, Claudy Waudy is must be very wewwy nwice in your world where the fwairies spwinkle dusty wusty and make shortbwead and all pway together nicewy and no one who's acquitted of a crimey wimey is ever guilty wuilty..

[Claudia Drezner]

Lame.

[El Pibe]

Perfectly encapsulating how everyone feels about your weak trolling ways.

How about some of those hypothetical dialogues you used to do, they were at least well written and entertaining. I'm sure you can squeeze one or two in before 'claudia' is kicked off.

[Claudia Drezner]

?

[El Pibe]

Ah well, too late.

[Loz]

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But aren't they back because of new evidence? And surely if they are guilty then they should be convicted?

From what they are reporting, I wouldn't get your hopes up. Sounds like a first class cockup on the evidence front.

[DJKillaQueen]

Hasn't that been the problem throughout though.....flaws in handling evidence? They have to be proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt...and there are good reasons for that. The rest is up to the Police and CPS to get their side of things right.