Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://andrexblogroll.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/bono.jpg


Been a long time since we've all participated in a collective hate session on the pompous overblown hedge funding tax avoiding NOBO (hate him so much I can't bring myself even to speak his name) so I thought I'd kick it off with a reprise of my old slash video knocked up quickly to celebrate the previous thread outing. To NOBO lovers please note thread title - none of your whinging jangly guitarred messages of support - start your own bleeding thread.




U2 is an original species... there are colours and feelings and emotional terrain that we occupy that is ours and ours alone.

Bono

ibilly99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://andrexblogroll.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/

> bono.jpg

>

> U2 is an original species... there are colours and

> feelings and emotional terrain that we occupy that

> is ours and ours alone.

> Bono


ERmm............right.

Good to see there's not a lot of hate around - hating BONO was a boom hatred when the party seemed endless and a new economic paridigm had been found - nor more boom and bust - we were all going to get rich by stuffing ourselves on endless cheap debt - a ton to see the Oirish prancers - that will do nicely ...


Bono owns a 1.5% stake in social networking site Facebook, an investment that is currently valued at ?500 million.


Bono responded to his critics in Times Online on 19 February 2006, calling them "cranks carping from the sidelines. A lot of them wouldn?t know what to do if they were on the field. They?re the party who will always be in opposition so they?ll never have to take responsibility for decisions because they know they?ll never be able to implement them.


Partner in a vc company


http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/39/2010/08/500x_bono_ali_hewson_290810.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...