Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1. Danby St's in Peckham.

2. Has the "problem" become worse?

3. How many residents have cars compared to, say, ten or fifteen years ago?

4. Would you like to pay for the privilege of still not being able to park outside your house?

5. As Southwark does not yet have a Commissar of Parking, you could contact your local councillor, who might see the opportunity for a splendid wheeze to make the council lots of dosh without solving the "problem" in the slightest.

Does your street have houses that have been converted into flats (thereby increasing the number of potential car owners)?

Has your street become wealthier in recent years (thereby increasing the potential number of car owners)

Are there local businesses and shops that make it a vibrant community but add to the parking pressure?

Who do you think owns the car that is taking up the space you'd like to have?

Why do you leave your space during the day so have problems when you get back (where do you go/park when you are away from your street)?



All these questions and their answers and more have been discussed on a thread about the proposed CPZ at ED station.


Are you new to the EDF or is this a glorious wind up?

A little excavation in the Forum's files shows that sparky74 is not new to the Forum. The excavated posts show her to be -- I think -- a young mother with a frantic life.


My bet is that as her children have grown older -- taking part in more "activities", incurring more busyness -- she has found herself, involuntarily, ferrying them hither and thither, and even hither and yon. Then, on her return from the latest errand... all the parking spots are full. No wonder she feels aggrieved, even if there's no one or no thing against which a grievance can really be mounted.


Without off-street parking, to keep a car in London is as much a load as it is a load-lightener. One more burden to shoulder, then, ma'am, and truly, you DO have my sympathies.

I walked down Danby St at about 2.30 this afternoon - there were eight spaces dotted along the road, and plenty in adjacent Copleston Road. Ironically, the last 100 yards of the road at the Bellenden Road end are in the Controlled Parking Zone, so if there has been an increase in parking pressure, the CPZ must be a significant factor. Of course, the council are happy with this, as they want those just outside a CPZ to press for it to be expanded. Mission creep, more cash in the coffers and little or no change to the existing parking pressures...

Half of Choumert Road has been non parking since october beacuse of the gas works but I have still been able to park in the road and usually within visual distance of my house, even right outside. It's been adjacent to the CPZ for as long as I can recall and I really don't find it a problem. It's typical London parking.


I can't see why Danby would be any different really.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...