Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A few years back a whole bunch of us used to go to the Oval Friday for every test every year for a good 10 years or so. We started with breakfast in the Fox (?) in Smithfield at 8AM, full English and two pints of Guinness plus you could take all you could carry in in those days. I very rarely remembered anything from tea onwards...apart from the arrests (only one year).

I was arrested at the cricket once as well. At the Wanderers when I was a student they used to let us take as much booze in as we wanted too but they didn?t like it when you smoked controlled substances in the stands.


AAhh. See, look at that, we?ve bonded . Cricket?s nice innit.

Best contribution from OBO today:


"You could score a double century using a stick of celery and Boycott would

(a) criticise you for not using rhubarb

(b) suggest that you should've scored more and

© opine that his grandmother could've done the same with the stub of an HB pencil.

Boycott is the Eeyore of cricket commentators, nothing will ever remove the cloud of gloom from his vision."

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A few years back a whole bunch of us used to go to

> the Oval Friday for every test every year for a

> good 10 years or so. We started with breakfast in

> the Fox (?) in Smithfield at 8AM, full English and

> two pints of Guinness plus you could take all you

> could carry in in those days. I very rarely

> remembered anything from tea onwards...apart from

> the arrests (only one year).


Quids - it was the Fox & Anchor and I've been drinking (and eating their breakfasts) there since 1972. Unfortunately, it became incorporated into a Malmaison hotel about two years ago and has lost the special ambience it used to have. No longer do you see a Smithfield porter eating a massive fry up with a pint, next to a City gent eating his fry up with a glass of claret who's sitting alongside some night nurses from Barts Hospital replenishing after a hard night's duty. The Bishop's Finger remains and was, at least 6 months ago. still serving a decent pint of Shepherd Neame.


Also - regrettably all cricket clubs with the honourable exception of Lords now seem to ban alcohol - clearly an economic argument cos' you can still drink as much as you want of their gnats p*** beer or their EU wine lake p*** poor wine rather than bring in a decent glass of something.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These guys fought back well today. There may still

> be a game on here.


Agree - and it was good to see their opener, Tamin, make his century. A tad embarrassing tho' for England in their Ashes preparation year, a very ordinary bowling attack for most of the day. Would having Broad in the bowling line up rather than Finn / Bresnan have made a difference on the relatively lifeless pitch?


Edited for spelling

Quite possibly. I read in the metro this morning that they were just resting Broad and that Fin got a bowl as the second choice. I?ve harboured a bit of a dislike for Broad ever since I saw him backchat an umpire but I think he is the best choice for an all-rounder England are going to have in the foreseeable future.


Apparently it was only a tenner to get into Lords yesterday.

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yep, of course I do - did you not read the bit from the survey about the noise having a negative impact on foraging bats? And like @Angelina I'm aware it affects other people, and if no one complains then it gives them an argument that's it's all ok.  The tree in question was a cherry that everyone loves, didn't need to be touched, and the council admitted was a mistake and shouldn't have happened.  The council and Gala use the 'local' narrative as a benefit, without any figures to back it up. It is used as an argument for the event to go ahead, when there's no basis of fact. The attendees are clearly not local as they've proved they don't give a **** about the area. The council do tell us where the money is spent - 100% on running the Events dept, and a myriad of unlisted free events. They just don't tell us how much, so that we can make an informed decision on whether the gain is with the pain.  Sorry, what was your point again?
    • Leon came this evening and did a small job.  He was able to fit me, which I’m grateful for.  He arrived when he said he would. Very professional & friendly guy, offered great advice and very reasonable prices.  Highly recommend Leon! 👍  
    • Thanks, that's quite big, isn't it?
    • Lots of people are concerned about the impact on the environment.  I’m not personally bothered by the noise but I know people are and I will therefore lend my support in challenging the management and location of the event.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...