Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Latest edition of Which? magazine has an article on PC Security software.


Microsoft Security Essentials is a free download, and finished second in their tests, only two percent behind the winner (bullguard). The likes of Norton were a good 10% behind.


Top 4 "Best Buys"


1. BULLGUARD Internet Security '12 - 86% - ?18

2. Microsoft Security Essentials - 84% - Free

3. AVG 2012 - 77% - ?30

4. AVG Free Version - 75%

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21036-pc-security/
Share on other sites

It was widely known several years ago that free anti-virus software offered a decent level of security. For the paid services, the best of the best seems to change every year. However, virtualisations and sandboxes are the way forward for safe online browsing.


There are a few issues I have with Which tests. They don't test all of the products on the market. Sometimes the testing methodology leaves a lot to be desired. Testing results are dumbed down which means you cannot read betweeen the lines.


@Peter, although the Microsoft Security Essentials is not a bad product, there are better free ones elsewhere so I don't believe they've cornered the market. Besides, paid AV software tend to be bloated and causeyour system to slow down.


Well done Otta for realising now you don't have to pay for good software.


Edite: missed out believe

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21036-pc-security/#findComment-508676
Share on other sites

I have been using Microsoft security essentials for 2 years without any virus getting through, common sense will keep most of the problems down as does regular updates. I have Windows 8 (developers preview) and this comes pre-loaded with security essentials (called defender) I agree with undisputedtruth virtualisation works well but eats a fair amount of RAM. Google chrome is sandboxed so that should make it the most secure one to use. also XXX domain names are moving the porn off the WWW so at least that's some good news
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21036-pc-security/#findComment-508886
Share on other sites

Defender was pre-loaded with my Windows 7. Never used it though.


My machine has 8gb of RAM and should be adequate for virtualsation. These days RAM is dirt cheap.

I don't like the fact that Windows 7 doesn't like programs installed on another partition to its operating system. Do you know if Windows 8 have the same issue?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21036-pc-security/#findComment-509458
Share on other sites

Windows 8 is built on the same framework as 7 so I do not think it would allow that, Why would you want to run programs on a separate partition? programs need to access the registry and moving off the main partition will only cause problems. sure by all means move your data files and map them in explorer. but I would leave your programs with the O/S
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21036-pc-security/#findComment-509459
Share on other sites

I have a 100GB SSD Loaded with a 64bit Windows 7 and all my programs fit on it with half of it unused. Only the data is on a separate HDD. I do however run virtual builds stored on the HDD but as these are self contained I encounter no issues. The virtual machine program is stored along with the O/S Way to go!!!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21036-pc-security/#findComment-509468
Share on other sites

I've a 128GB SSD with 64 bit Windows 7 but waiting for HDDs prices to fall to a reasonable level. Damn the Thai floods. The peformance of the SSD was well worth the money. :))


Another reason for partitioning is that it just makes it easier to reinstall the OS than to reinstall OS and programs. But I shall resign to the fact that the feature I wanted most is not happening.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21036-pc-security/#findComment-509473
Share on other sites

I use Eset Nod32 antivirus 4 Think there is an antivirus 5 out now.


Supposedly the only A/V never to miss a new virus ???


Seems very good, and you can contact them and speak to a real person unlike McAfee where you communicate

with someone through some kind of messaging system which you have to set up with them.


Fox

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21036-pc-security/#findComment-509618
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
    • I’m on Darrell Road and have noticed this recently - your daughters are not alone! It seems to only be at night. Would you agree? High pitched and consistent. I’ve been wondering if it’s a street lamp, or a fox deterrent system.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...