Jump to content

Britain, Great Britain, United Kingdom, British Isles: What do they each refer to?


Recommended Posts

Britain - Is from the Roman name for the province that was here.

Great Britain - Is a geographical term referring to the big island on which England, Scotland and Wales are found.

United Kingdom - Is the political union of Scotland and England (and their territories.)

British Isles - Are the group of islands including Great Britain, Ireland, Isle of Mann, Shetland, the Hebrides etc.

That may be what it is called but the United Kingdom came into being when the Kingdoms of Scotland and England were united. Northern Ireland isn't a Kingdom. That's why it is, "The United Kindon of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" not "The United Kingdons of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"

I'm with Townleygreen - in the modern sense UK is England, Wales, Scotland and NI.


Following the Act of Union, the UK was England, Wales (that were considered to be one kingdom) and Scotland. All of Ireland (which was also a kingdom at the time) was added a little later with another Act of Union, before the Republic separated at the time of the partitioning, leaving the UK as it is today.

Like I said, The political union of Scotland and England (and their territories). I never suggested that NI, Wales and others aren't part of it. They aren't the Kingdoms which united to form the UK though. They aren't even Kingdoms.


Although this is interesting. I didn't realise that the facts about what countries are part of a political union could be established by opinion.

So when Ireland joined the party, some 200 years after United Kingdom of Great Britian had formed out the union of Scotland and England, it was known (to protestant Europe at least) as the Kingdom of Ireland. I didn't know that.


So it all comes down to the meaning of words which is really just semantics.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Totally agree regarding not supporting chains. Gail’s was fine but last time I went in Feb this year, actually walked out Fayetteville looking at menu and waiting 15 minutes to even get glass of water and not busy at all. Staff gone down hill - sooner it goes the better… Always prefer to support non chains - so many lovely places with good food to choose from with pleasant staff who know about customer service and sadly, non English which says a lot for our culture, pubs are also becoming abit of a hit and miss affair but maybe just unlucky. At the end of the day all about the chef. Still abit unclear where new place is located - is it down the road from Goose Green where parade of shops are before Peckham Rye?  
    • Surely only where the local businesses offer clear advantages, otherwise you are rewarding what should be failure. I want to be served by a better bakery than Gail's, not a worse but local independent one. Certainly give a local independent some time to get the offer right, but don't buy goods which are worse and or more expensive just because the outlet isn't a chain. 
    • Let’s just boycott all chains in favour of local businesses.  Places like Gail’s popping up everywhere has a very damaging impact on small businesses. It’s just the same as the new empanadas place but on a bigger scale. I’ll say it a million times more, we hold the power with our choices. Let’s use our power to look after ourselves and our environment (which includes small local family businesses). And yes, I also love Chacarero.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...