Jump to content

Recommended Posts

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're right I don't. I make him wear a thong - no

> ironing required. ;-)


:-$ Oh


There's nothing worse than a middle aged man ( with a whole bunch of arse hair ) bending over in a thong.


Actually, bending over without a thong is probably worse.


Is he quite hairy?


On a scale of 1-10.


(i'm trying to build an accurate mental picture here)


Come to think about it. If he is quite hairy, ( let's say an 8 ) and you get him to bend down in his thong, then you might find where all those spoons have gone. It was only this morning we were talking about this with our sons maths tutor. Her daughter works in A&E and one man came in with a teacup & another with a parsnip ( blunt end first) up their place where the sun don't shine.


It happens you know.


Let us know when you've looked please.


NETTE:-S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Our latest guest says that politicisation of universities is unhealthy, and the equation "Empire = Evil" is not historically tenable. He was used to speaking openly. Then in 2017 a Cambridge academic posted on social media in response to Biggar's proposed project looking at the Good and the Bad in Empire: "OMG this is serious shit. We Must CLOSE THIS DOWN." In his words, he saw there was a problem. Problems remain with embedded intolerance but this new member of the House of Lords still aspires to determine the truth of things. Meet Lord Biggar of Castle Douglas CBE, Regius Professor Emeritus of Moral & Pastoral Theology at Oxford University, on his visit to Peckham to talk with Chris Haydon and a small invited audience.  
    • What has any of this got to do with Gala?
    • I suspect Lambeth's legal team have decided that it is far better to potentially upset a High Court judge (maybe beg for forgiveness) than face the wrath of the legal teams of event organisers, promoters, service providers who would come after them for a lot of money if the event had to be cancelled. Clearly the original error was on the part of the council so I suspect that would make them liable for any losses/reputation damage incurred due cancellation/disruption.
    • I suspect it was putting "not bankrupting Lambeth Council" considerations first. Cancelling those festivals at a week to go could have been financially catastrophic and may have unleashed financial hell on Lambeth.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...