Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Any thoughts on this recent article?


http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2012/jan/01/parenting-france-britain


"First British women came under attack for being chubbier and less chic than their stylish Gallic sisters. Now another critical salvo has been fired across the Channel, this time over our ability to bring up well-behaved children."


I think the thing that stands out most is how misogynist it is, and the book the article refers to was written by a women. But is this one woman's conclusion correct? I wouldn't like to think so, but I bet she sells loads of books anyway!! Interesting food for thought. xx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21326-the-parenting-gap/
Share on other sites

Article fails to mention that any self respecting French baby goes for their bi-weekly "clapping" session. Nothing to do with rythm but a hard core method used by physios to get rid of mucus in the throat each time they have bronchiolitis (aka a cold):))


Pity me, French mum bringing up boisterous tomboyish toddler in the uk and just back from a week in France...

The book --by its own admission-- looks at a small group w/in a narrow band of society and draws comparisons to hyperbolic generalisations. So much so, that I can't see it as anything other than ridiculous! (Do people really make money out of this? Geez, I need to change jobs!)


Monkey, we'll look out for you at the playground: Elegant French mum with impeccable toddler. (I'm the disheveled and slightly crazy-looking mother with run away stylie toddler girl of course ;-) )

To say nothing of the horrific back problems even very young kids have due to carrying so many books to and from school...


Having said that, nothing got me to behave like my mother hissing "ca suffit" at me across a dinner table (she was a French teacher and boy, we knew we needed to stop mucking around when she swapped languages!)

It'll be interesting to see proper statistics about behavioural problems, happiness in life, family relations and maybe even academic achievement 20-30 years after a trend "settles" in a country. I can't imagine the extremer cases of Anglo-softness (where toddlers smacking other toddlers' heads are just told to "calm down now sweetness") really being good either.


I'm not playing devil's advocate and I'm not "for" the French case either, most definitely not smacking kids or scaring them into behaving, but a bit of continental clarity (i.e. boundaries that parents stick to) can't hurt anyone.. I think ;)

Sanne Panne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know I know.... but since we're discussing

> generalisations I trust it won't be taken any more

> literally than "the parisiennes" :)



Hahaha! Yes, was very much meant to be tongue-in-cheek!!:))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
    • this doesn't mean anything - it's a word salad with no reference to the topic at hand. And given the video I posted it's notable that you didn't reference it at all. The subject is the proliferation of weird intimidating Flag wavers....    As for me, I didn't vote Labour at last election, nor will I in next election (if I lived in a Labour/Tory/Reform marginal, that might be different)
    • Her legacy will be the Deputy leader/Housing Secretary who was the Labour party's sleaze crime fighter who broke the ministerial code for not paying enough stamp duty on one of her houses. As Housing Secretary she probably should have known better.    I wonder if she will defect to Corbyn where she will no doubt be welcomed with open arms and the words: "You did nothing wrong, it was all a media conspiracy comrade......"
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...