Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When I decided to buy a bike to pedal to work each day (5 miles each way) my mental arithmetic was pretty straight forward and plain wrong. Bike up front capital cost versus saved ongoing oyster card payment.


The reason this was dead wrong is I had missed at least ?100 per year in maintenance from the equation:

6 month service, including new chain and cassette, several flat tyres, gears need retuning / adjusting etc etc, replaced brake pads etc, etc.


I'm only in year 2 and maintenance costs will increase as the bike gets older (haven't changed the wheel rims yet but soon).

I would think ?100 - 150 per annum would be average for a daily commuter like me. If I rode my bike as a courier where I was doing say 5 x the miles, then this cost would be considerably higher.


Now clearly the single speed is not going to fix the puncture issue but many of the other costs would be saved or reduced.


With the added opex, suffice to say cycling is still massively NPV positive and much more fun.


I agree that cost may not be a major consideration for many but I can see how it would be in some cases. It would be wrong to think of cycling as a free mode of transport.

Daily use of a decent bike (?500 plus) would be at least ?100 for a standard bike shop service (consumables and labour)

A new wheel every year or so (say ?100)

Pair of tyres and inners (?50)

Brake blocks inbetween service (?15)


So ?265 before you even think about gears.


I need new chain rings, casette and chain once a year - cheapest Campag would be around ?110

Twice a year if you are a courier and you can understand the attraction of single speed.


Irrespective of the health and well-being benefits, and savings, once you get hooked on your bike you are hooked and you only want the best for your beast. Dunno what your opinion is based on Heugenot - suspect you are just being provocative.


Now what really get's my goat is those of you in your twenties on lovely racers wearing plimsols, flip flops (yes you do see them in summer) or other soft shoes, peddling on the middle of their feet rather than the ball of the foot (soles). Wasting so much energy and buggering up your body at the same time.

"I need new chain rings, casette and chain once a year - cheapest Campag would be around ?110"


The rest are independent of gears, yeah? Wheel, brakes and tyres?


So 2 quid a week - less than the cost of half a pint? Come on, you're not making a bicycle decision on that basis?


How much extra did you pay for your tight shorts?


It's just COOL to be single speed ;-)


I'm only teasing - so don't get stressed!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • that is one cliche-ridden post headnun    it doesn’t mean a sack of beans in the real world  “old fashioned voters” meaning the ones dragging the country down this last 15 years just to laugh at the libs tears. Well done all  I’m not looking back at all. This is not a post Europe world in any sense. There are forces bigger than Europe but uk would be better aligning with Europe against, say, china, the pretending we live in some post Europe world.    and in case you hadn’t noticed, whoever you vote for, there are a LOT of ignorant racists feeling very happy with their resurgence - I would fight against them if I were you 
    • No they aren't. You're coming across as a smug, superior liberal, and that's what old fashioned voters (labour, Cons and now Reform) hate. That 'the deplorables' 'they're all ignorant racists' line is what's driving people away from the traditional parties and towards Reform.  You're as guilty of looking back as Labour. This is a new, post-europe world and we all need to come to terms with that, make do with what we have, and move forward.       
    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government  Specifically Chris mason - a not very bright right leaning stooge - large part of why bbc news has become grok-level slop  
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...