Jump to content

I have the Sherlock fake suicide worked out...oh yes


Recommended Posts

Well its Ms Reggie and myself got it.

Moffat hinted thus:True devotees will spot them (clues). THROUGH THEIR TEARS!!!


What does Sherlock do that he never does....cry.

Why does he cry...to create tears.

You can see his tears fall...thus helping those down below to move the soft landing into place directly below him.


Got it!

Ah well a gust of wind would also affect his fall which is the part of the reason for the teardrop, to make allowances for wind.

In a roundabout way Sherlock admits to the 'fake' tears with his speech to Watson on being a fake.


He also needs to have Watson stand far away so that the gunman cannot see Watson and the prepared landing at the same time.

Throwing his mobile down sends the message 'Im jumping now'(he doesn't want it in his pocket when he lands).

Exactly! And with wind-shift surely...

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT64bvZTta0cZAwnBcrlt7VjloO4sbwGF6F0tHTj6JEJMWIcAHNIg + http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRevJMOgBclkCzIpoykCNV1Ku05MY3g65QaZ227z-RUt49h63PDpw > http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/01/17/article-2087814-0F8035B200000578-692_634x396.jpg



OR



A spherical teardrop of mass m, radius r, vertical velocity v (positive downward), and

mass density ρd ≈ 1 g cm−3 satisfies

m =

4

3

πρdr3 (1)

dm

dt = πρmr2|v| (2)

m

dv

dt = mg −

C

2

πρar2v|v| − v

dm

dt

(3)

where the terms on the right-hand side of equation (3) give the weight, air drag, and mist drag

acting on the growing drop.

When the air drag is written as above, the drag coefficient C = C® is a function only of

the Reynolds number [6, 7] R = 2r|v|/ν, where ν is the kinematic viscosity of air. Figure 1

shows C® measured for falling liquid drops (data points, [8]), together with the small-R

theoretical Stokes result C = 24/R (broken line, [6]) and a new empirical result (full line),

C = 12R−1/2 (4)

valid over the intermediate range 10 < R < 1000. Such simple algebraic results allow us

to avoid complicated numerical results for C® obtained from the nonlinear Navier?Stokes

equations [7]. Inserting equation (4) into equation (3) and setting dm/dt = dv/dt = 0 yields

the mist-free terminal or ?settling? speed of drops of radius r with 10 < R < 1000:

v0 = σr (5)

There's a great post here with a bunch of interesting theories, but have a look at the screenshot at the very bottom. The figure on the stretcher looks pretty clearly like Mycroft, not Sherlock...


http://bloodredorion.tumblr.com/post/16159755295/how-did-sherlock-survive

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry Sue - me again. This has been on my mind all day, it's a big bug bear of mine. If you don't mind - please can you private message me some of these shops so I can cross reference / add to my AVOID list.  Thanks in advance. Let's make sure this doesn't happen this Christmas, particularly as we head into sales season. Even more problematic in my experience.
    • Pity you didn't quote what you are referring to, Mal. I didn't see the previous post, and my mind is boggling 😮
    • The Cherry Tree was absolutely excellent for a while when a youngish couple ran it and brought in a really good chef. It was them who renamed it The Cherry Tree. They were really turning it around. The chef did fantastic Scotch eggs, and one of the best roasts I've ever had. If memory serves the then owner,  for some reason known only to himself, took a dislike to them and what they were doing and sacked them all. And yes we weren't expecting a top class  meal last Christmas, and we left it too late to book anywhere else, but we weren't expecting it for a hundred pounds EACH to be quite as terrible as it was. Stupid us. Not sure why you are confused by my post, Jazzer? Did I misremember? Now it's got even more confusing because my posts have been merged and your confused emoji is shown at the bottom of the second one instead of the first 🤣
    • Hear hear. Very well said. Thank you and all the best for the year ahead 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...