Jump to content

I have the Sherlock fake suicide worked out...oh yes


Recommended Posts

Well its Ms Reggie and myself got it.

Moffat hinted thus:True devotees will spot them (clues). THROUGH THEIR TEARS!!!


What does Sherlock do that he never does....cry.

Why does he cry...to create tears.

You can see his tears fall...thus helping those down below to move the soft landing into place directly below him.


Got it!

Ah well a gust of wind would also affect his fall which is the part of the reason for the teardrop, to make allowances for wind.

In a roundabout way Sherlock admits to the 'fake' tears with his speech to Watson on being a fake.


He also needs to have Watson stand far away so that the gunman cannot see Watson and the prepared landing at the same time.

Throwing his mobile down sends the message 'Im jumping now'(he doesn't want it in his pocket when he lands).

Exactly! And with wind-shift surely...

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT64bvZTta0cZAwnBcrlt7VjloO4sbwGF6F0tHTj6JEJMWIcAHNIg + http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRevJMOgBclkCzIpoykCNV1Ku05MY3g65QaZ227z-RUt49h63PDpw > http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/01/17/article-2087814-0F8035B200000578-692_634x396.jpg



OR



A spherical teardrop of mass m, radius r, vertical velocity v (positive downward), and

mass density ρd ≈ 1 g cm−3 satisfies

m =

4

3

πρdr3 (1)

dm

dt = πρmr2|v| (2)

m

dv

dt = mg −

C

2

πρar2v|v| − v

dm

dt

(3)

where the terms on the right-hand side of equation (3) give the weight, air drag, and mist drag

acting on the growing drop.

When the air drag is written as above, the drag coefficient C = C® is a function only of

the Reynolds number [6, 7] R = 2r|v|/ν, where ν is the kinematic viscosity of air. Figure 1

shows C® measured for falling liquid drops (data points, [8]), together with the small-R

theoretical Stokes result C = 24/R (broken line, [6]) and a new empirical result (full line),

C = 12R−1/2 (4)

valid over the intermediate range 10 < R < 1000. Such simple algebraic results allow us

to avoid complicated numerical results for C® obtained from the nonlinear Navier?Stokes

equations [7]. Inserting equation (4) into equation (3) and setting dm/dt = dv/dt = 0 yields

the mist-free terminal or ?settling? speed of drops of radius r with 10 < R < 1000:

v0 = σr (5)

There's a great post here with a bunch of interesting theories, but have a look at the screenshot at the very bottom. The figure on the stretcher looks pretty clearly like Mycroft, not Sherlock...


http://bloodredorion.tumblr.com/post/16159755295/how-did-sherlock-survive

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’ve just seen this notice for extending DYL’s but I’m confused as to how long the extension will be. Is it going to be from LL to no.2 Bawdale Road? Or 3M from no 2 Bawdale Road? i) add new lengths or extend existing lengths of ‘DYLs’ (i) in ASTBURY ROAD west side opposite Nos. 3 and 5 Astbury Road (5m), (ii) in BAWDALE ROAD on both sides south-east of its junction with Lordship Lane (22m on the side of No. 157 Lordship Lane, 3m o/s No. 2 Bawdale Road, and 10m opposite No.2 Bawdale Road),
    • If they're not sure they should at least be able to provide a range: reasonably best and worst case scenarios.  It's embarrassing.
    • I would report this to the police - the footage is excellent and he's pretty distinguishable. This won't be his first time doing this and it will help police link him to other crimes by cross-matching your CCTV to other surveillance. Definitely contact them. 
    • Vladi, sorry to hear this has happened to you. Was the car locked and if so do you know how he was able to unlock it?  The suspect looks quite young. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...