Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, was anyone in Dulwich Park on Monday afternoon? Did you see an elderly man laying face down on the ground. People were trying to help with chest compressions until the ambulance arrived. The poor guy looked in a bad way and there was a lot of blood coming from his face. They worked on him for a good 20 minutes or so, but i left and i can't get him out of my head. Does anyone know what happened to him?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21662-incident-in-dulwich-park/
Share on other sites

Aren't we taking 'respect for privacy' a little too far if the relatives of a man who died in a public place name him to millions in a newspaper...yet he is carefully referred to as 'Mr X' on a forum read by a few thousand?

it's a bit like the closing down of discussion on another thread, where it emerged that, apparently, a man had hanged himself in Sydenham wood. There, all discussion stopped after a posting that we should 'respect this persons privacy and allow the police to do their job'. If someone has hanged themselves in a public wood where I take my children, I'd like to know about it.

If we take this too far everyone will be anonymous, no deaths will be spoken about, and we won't be able to pin anything down.

*No-one's privacy has been disrespected in the production of this posting

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can understand calling him Mr.X.

> EDF threads sometimes go of at tangents.

> Not stating the persons name ensures that if this

> thread did go of at a tangent the family wouldn't

> feel powerless and as personal for them.


Exactly. I'm fairly new here but thia forum seems like a fairly close community. Personalising the conversation by adding Mr. X's name could make the family feel uncomfortable. Imagine, a group of friends is talking about someone's recently deceased relative and then send the transcript to them by post. Sure, you can do some research and easily find out his name but it's not about that.

Mike_B Wrote: ignore their comments obviously just looking for an argument. I agree his name should not be broadcast without relatives consent. Typicle easy Dulwich busy body's that's the reason the place gets a bad reputation.

-------------------------------------------------------

> James Barber Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I can understand calling him Mr.X.

> > EDF threads sometimes go of at tangents.

> > Not stating the persons name ensures that if

> this

> > thread did go of at a tangent the family

> wouldn't

> > feel powerless and as personal for them.

>

> Exactly. I'm fairly new here but thia forum seems

> like a fairly close community. Personalising the

> conversation by adding Mr. X's name could make the

> family feel uncomfortable. Imagine, a group of

> friends is talking about someone's recently

> deceased relative and then send the transcript to

> them by post. Sure, you can do some research and

> easily find out his name but it's not about that.

Nicholas Spears Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Aren't we taking 'respect for privacy' a little

> too far if the relatives of a man who died in a

> public place name him to millions in a

> newspaper...yet he is carefully referred to as 'Mr

> X' on a forum read by a few thousand?

> it's a bit like the closing down of discussion on

> another thread, where it emerged that, apparently,

> a man had hanged himself in Sydenham wood. There,

> all discussion stopped after a posting that we

> should 'respect this persons privacy and allow the

> police to do their job'. If someone has hanged

> themselves in a public wood where I take my

> children, I'd like to know about it.

> If we take this too far everyone will be

> anonymous, no deaths will be spoken about, and we

> won't be able to pin anything down.

> *No-one's privacy has been disrespected in the

> production of this posting


I would like to know more in the public domain about the man found dead in Sydenham Hill woods, and I did not know he hanged himself, it is not morbid or curiosity seeking, but if you live locally and walk through the woods, it is nice to know what is going on..

When a loved one has died in a public place, as my sister did in a hit and run incident, even though you want the culprit caught so they are not able to commit another crime, you actually desire more than anything privacy, not your relative named and becoming a public spectacle. As a family we denied any media interference as the media only sensationalise stories like this. The culprit was caught and justice was seen to be done without the media getting involved.


Give the man in the park and his family some privacy and as for the man in Sydenham park, I am sure this will not lead to a spate of hangings that you and your children may come across!!!

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...