Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well to be authentic and new age about it we could always strip the holiday back to what it originally was.


As we all know, the celebrations around Christmas and New Year have their roots in the midwinter celebrations that happened all over Europe in various forms since man first invented party hats. It is a way of marking that we are halfway through the hardship of winter. A bit like going to the pub on a Wednesday night. Let?s call these ?pagan? celebrations for arguments sake.


Now I don?t know about you but I was raised to believe that paganism involved running around on the heath in the nuddy. Which would NOT be very appropriate. And in this weather? You?ll catch your death!


That kind of thing may be fine for fundraising for the WI or Catholic Woman?s League but not for Christmas.


Nativity plays are ok by me. Especially considering the alternatives.

ChavWivaLawDegree Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Is it something that should be phased out so as

> not to offend people of other or no religion? Or

> should there be room for this Christian tradition

> alongside traditional celebrations from other

> religions?

>

> This debate drives me nuts, I am from a muslim background and am disgusted that christians should have to defend putting on a traditional play. Keep 'em going, I loved being in them as a kid. What has this society come to when we have to ponder every single aspect of our lives for fear of "offending" another section of it.

it's not really a question of fair play or unfair play tho is it Tillie?


No-one is stopping any schools having nativity plays. It sounds like many parents want them. I'm not aware of any real coalition of non-Christian groups demanding they be stopped


Is it just school governers being overly-sensitive? Or are they trying a few different thing? By that I don't think there is any element of "politically correct" imposition here. It's entirely down to the school in question and what they want to do


Judging by the comments on here people who want a nativity play will complain to their schools and everyone else will go about their merry way...

PC gone crazy if you ask me when it comes to schools being afraid of holding nativity plays through fear of upsetting the non-christian element of society. Even my friends of varying religions find this all absolutely ridiculous and do not support or condone it one bit, in fact they say it makes things worse for them!


This is entirely my point - to state THAT as the reason for this is to make an assumption. I don't believe ANYONE is afraid or scared. It;s just an excuse to lazily dredge up "political correcteness gone made" cliche


But then I made that point in my last post and it was ignored


If it IS schoolds making this decision based on "fear" then it's nowt to do with PC, christians, muslims or anything APART from a lame, weak, school-head. No-one is imposing anything on any schools. Not me, not Ken, not Labour, not anything...


But if a school chooses to look at the wider world reflected in it's pupil-base and chooses to do something other than the white-Christiann tradiition, and not because of "fear" then that's a perfectly valid choice

I totally agree with the point below.


I went to a CofE school and it drove me nuts. In Science they taught you about experimentation and proving stuff, then next lessons asked you to take on faith what you were being told about the story of Christ and so on. Such hypocrisy. Whilst political correctness has its place when it comes to being kind and reasonable and inclusive to all people of all backgrounds, the fear factor and litigious society we find ourselves in nowadays has made it just plain nasty and daft. Myself, I try and be good NOT because of the carrot of heaven or the stick of hell, but because it just makes sense to be good and so on. I have looked into the eyes of women whose kids have been murdered, they know at that point there was no God. It was just humans being bad.


There is no God. Get over it people. We made him up when we didn't have the science to explain rainbows and thunder.


Meanwhile, when Judi Dench's daughter was a little girl she played the InnKeeper's wife (proving that there have always been crap roles for women over 30 throughout the ages), and the press came and invited her to tell them what the Nativity was about. In true starry style she replied, "It's about this Inn Keeper's Wife...."



> > This debate drives me nuts, I am from a muslim

> background and am disgusted that christians should

> have to defend putting on a traditional play. Keep

> 'em going, I loved being in them as a kid. What

> has this society come to when we have to ponder

> every single aspect of our lives for fear of

> "offending" another section of it.

Yeah I tend to agree with Sean on the ?Political Correctness Gone Mad? thing. I am not particularly for political correctness myself (I have this ridiculous idea that people can just get along regardless of their differences if they are adult about it.) but I think the term ?Political Correctness Gone Mad? has been hijack by some circles to create a siege mentality.
But it isn't the schools themselves that make the decision as to whether or not they have a nativity, well certainly not in my local primary, when I asked the headteacher why there was no traditional nativity play this year as it was Christmas, she said, "officially" they were exploring other religions and ways of celebrating yuletide this year, but unofficially and off the record (as she is a friend as well) she said they have had pressure from "the powers that be", to do this.
Sean, sometimes, as much as you are lovely and adoreable, you can come across as a tad condescending. I essentially meant that its good to hear the other side of the penny in these (controversial) issues because I believe that they are probably the mainstream opinion and not the opinions portrayed in the press. I do like you awfully and will buy you the biggest drink tomorrow. xxxx

Well if the ?powers that be? are putting pressure on them to not celebrate Christmas then what has to be established is if this is an across the board drive to make state education completely secular and if so does society agree with it. That is the big question.


Personally I think it is a stupid idea but it is something that is up to society as a whole. Many people completely shun the religious side of Christmas in their personal lives so perhaps it is time for the education system to reflect that. It would be a sad development in my opinion but there you go.


As for the non-competitiveness in sports and such: Well then the human race may as well just lay down in its own filth and decide to stop evolving. If this business does take off in English schools then it is a sad day indeed. 1966 I think it was. Well don?t hold your breath coz it aint happening again.

Brendon, I agree with you, how is that supposed to prepare our children for the competitiveness they will face in the real world? Competing for jobs, better money, better positions in life, I agree with you, even the exams are being dumbed down so as to make children not feel like they are underachieving, although this is also so that the government can turn around and say way hay, look at all those kids with all those O'/A'levels, who says our education system is failing? and we are basically teaching our kids crap, the sad thing is they expect us to believe it is all in their best interests but does nothng to prepare them for the big bad world out there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The coop of Forest Hill Road is very different- cheerful and helpful staff 
    • Would you expose your young people to 'that man'? That is apparently a real question. 'That man' is in fact a retired Oxford Professor of Moral & Pastoral Theology who wrote a book setting out to provide a moral reckoning on the vexed subject of Britain's Empire and its history. What might formerly have been a purely academic matter has become highly contentious, and according to one Cambridge academic "serious shit" that needed to be CLOSED DOWN. It's all rather amazing, the stuff of satire or nightmare but not of the real world. Anyway, Lord Biggar accepted an invitation to visit Peckham and speak to and with a small audience that was due to include young Black students ... who in the end didn't come on the day! Having set the whole thing up to facilitate this encounter for them, the outcome was a disappointment. The conversation with Lord Biggar and audience was not:   
    • Entertaining a visitor from Philippines, she's been here before but I've promised lunch.  Somewhere a little different maybe, quirky?
    • Surely a very simple: "how much does the council receive from the organisers of the Gala festival for payment for use of Peckham Rye" would smoke out a response. The "commercial sensitivity" could be because the council are giving it away or it could be because Gala don't want others to know how much they are paying - it is really tough to make money from any type of festival these days and Wide Awake in Brockwell, for example, sent out a plea for people to buy tickets via a reduced price "Tell a Friend" special offer because (they said much of it linked to the problems Lambeth were having with the High Court) things were entering "squeaky bum time"  and they were struggling to hit their break-even point. It does make me wonder whether expansion is baked-in to the agreements the council has with the organisers for events like Gala as the organisers have to be able to scale the size of the event each year to try to make money. I do also how much of the "revenue" from these events might be swallowed up by the provision of the "free community" event element of them. The comment piece in the Guardian sums it up quite nicely: The heart of this issue seems to be how cash-strapped councils are becoming increasingly beholden to commercial interests to the detriment of the public. A weekend festival that welcomes 50,000 people can expect to raise about £500,000 for local authorities. Councils argue that this money goes back in the public purse, allowing them to continue funding free community events such as Lambeth’s beloved Country Show, though there doesn’t seem to be much transparency over exactly how much cash is raised or where it is allocated.   The issue for councils may well be that if people found out how much was actually being raised by these events that the community would say the disruption is not worth it and I do wonder how much of the revenue is being swallowed up by the provision of the "free event" using the same infrastructure. Any time a council doesn't want to share something openly very much suggests that it is because they think constituents won't like the answer.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...