Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Perhaps not relevant to most of you, and probably not overly significant to most people in ED, but for those of you who have grown up locally, the demise of yet another staunchly local, traditional, and predominantly working class public house made me reflect a little this evening.


The Bun House on Peckham High Street has been a prominent and historical local building since it's founding as a public house in 1898. The pubs name reflects it's former incarnation throughout most of the 19th century as a local bakery. My father was a regular attendee, as was my grandfather going back over many years. I know many people on ED who would rate The Bun House as a local institution ranking alongside the likes of the EDT, the White horse, the gowlett and of course the now defunct oglander arms.


Like many traditional south London institutions, kennedys sausages included, yet another sad death nail has been hammered into the heart of the traditional working class community. It sometimes feels as though home isn't home anymore, as much as I love so much about the positives of gentrification, I wish it could sit alongside other cultures and traditions rather than unknowingly contribute to their demise. Of course other factors are at play too, demand and supply, tough economic times, changing social habits et al.


Anyhow, the closure isn't just the death of a pub, or a rather successful art gallery (which resides out the back), but for some, a way of life.


R.I.P Bun House, you will be sorely missed :)-D

Do you know what will happen to the building now Louise ?


And by the way ages ago there was a thread on the EDF which had a link to a lengthy document ,available on line and in hard copy ,with loads of history about the buildings in Rye Lane .

I think it was by English Heritage or something like that ?

You wouldn't happen to remember it or be able to post the link ?

Yes I googled and read that report Intexas and Peckham High Street and Rye Lane have the most surviving original buildings behind the shops than any other high street In Britain.

It was a fascinating document, detailing the chronological erection of the buildings often in pairs or quartets by different builders.

For instance, down the Co-operative Flats end and on the otherside of the road is a quartet of buildings with oriental influence, at a time when the public were engrossed with exotic images of 'empire'. I never noticed it till I read the report. Now I can't go up Rye Lane without seeking out all the amazing buildings tucked behind the prefab shopfronts.

Hi all, I found this dicussion via twitter, I live down by the Bun House and it's sad what's happened there. There is a thread with some info about it over at South East Central forum.

http://bit.ly/wDfxb4


There is currently a plan in place (posted at SECentral) to rip out its current facade. The council are still taking objections until the 2nd Feb, so if you do have an interest in maintaining its usage as a pub or preserving the facade or other aspects of this Victorian relic then please check out the details. the Peckham Society have also written in with their objections - that letter is here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9732167/The Bun House - Final.pdf

I understand they have recently made new plans to tear out the back as well, so where the flats are is an old chimney and lovely old London brick, but they want to strip that out and convert it so that up to 10 flats can be built out the back of it, which will totally destroy its character. I only heard that from the pub landlord last night, as apparently the developers came in this week to discuss their new plans. Rumour has it that they are thinking of putting a Starbucks there, ye gods! I shall be out there with my pitchfork if that happens! Anyway - I'm not sure how real all of this is just yet, but would appreciate any support / letters of objection etc that you can rustle up.

thanks so much!

I didn't know about the previous history of some of the buildings behind the shop fascias along Rye Lane so this is extremely interesting to me. It is my understanding that this building isn't protected so the developers can change the fascia of the building without too much objection. Starbucks have shown interest in taking up the lease on the retail space currently occupied by The Bun House following the development of the building.


Louisa.

Louisa and all others who really care about this stuff, please do consider joining The Peckham Society. They successfully managed to get two of the buildings on that road listed, including the one behind the shop called Crackerjack. The Peckham Society News Magazine came second in the best local magazine last year and its editor, John Beasley, writes all the local history books on Peckham East Dulwich and others. There are often very interesting talks on various aspects of local history.


Hope you decide to join - I love it!

thenjericho Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "It is not the strongest of the species that

> survives, nor the most intelligent that survives.

> It is the one that is the most adaptable to

> change." - Charles Darwin



?Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.? -Maria Robinson


Louisa.

That's really sad. Any Peckham (SE15) forumites (EDF is the best local forum for all things SE22-SE15) please contact Jacob and join this push http://www.volunteercentres.org.uk/index.php/flipside-peckham-campaign-peckham-voluntary-sector-forum/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...