Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi


I stupidly parked for 3 mins on a single yellow line yesterday whilst picking up my daughter and found a penalty charge notice when I returned - only thing is, it's dated 1/2/2004 (date of contravention) and the same for date of service of this notice. I don't know how this has happened but does it give me any leeway for not paying the ticket?

thanks

I am not a lawyer, but I would say go and buy a lottery ticket - it's your lucky day.


According to the legislation, a notice of enforcement must be made within six months of the date the ticket was served, according to the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007. Yours is coming up to eight years. I think the council has missed the boat.


If the council were silly enough to admit the date was wrong, then the ticket would - IMHO - be unenforceable they would be admitting that the ticket failed to include the correct date the ticket was served.


You'll probably need to go through the normal appeal channels. I would venture that if your car was made after 2005 you have a decent excuse right there, anyway...!

You might not have owned the car in 2004, or the Warden might not have worked for the authority at that time.

One year can be an error but eight years is not reasonable.

If the ticket was issued in 2004 the rule that is quoted might not apply.

Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007.

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You might not have owned the car in 2004, or the

> Warden might not have worked for the authority at

> that time.

> One year can be an error but eight years is not

> reasonable.

> If the ticket was issued in 2004 the rule that is

> quoted might not apply.

> Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions

> (England) General Regulations 2007.


Hello all, my car is N Reg so 1995-1996 so obviously couldn't have owned it in 2004...I think I will phone up and explain rather than risk an appeal. Thanks so much for all advice and info

I jest we live in compromised times and if we can get away with stuff we do - lost count of the number of times I winged a few stops on the old number 12's instead of walking but what I do remember was my dear dad (RIP) making me walk back a mile to the shops to take back a packet of stamps when the shopkeeper had accidentally given me a second packet by mistake. He was as honest as the day is long and it would have never have occured to him to find ways around facing up to his responsibility. He tried to sign up in 1939 but his eyesight let him down he was conscripted in 1940. There are sadly far too many fewer of these folk around today and we are worse off because of it.


Morality is a continnuum and I am probably too far down the line of can I get away with it rather than am I responsible for it. Still to recognise it is part way to solving it. Pay up like a man or woman and seek your recompense in karmic happiness and the knowledge you did right when it would be so much easier to shirk your responsibilty. I for one and many of the board will applaud such a decision - in fact if there is a god they might even let you off so would be win-win all round.


kar?ma (k?rm)

n.

1. Hinduism & Buddhism The total effect of a person's actions and conduct during the successive phases of the person's existence, regarded as determining the person's destiny.

If I was given that extra pack of stamps, I too would return it because someone would lose out. Just as I would always correct incorrect change, etc.


But a parking ticket? Given how many dodgy, sneaky and - lets not beat around the bush - fraudulent tickets issued every year by parking officials. Sorry, but consider this return on bad karma for the council parking people. They deserve it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...