Fred Goodwin...sir

[Huguenot]

Damian H, you really shouldn't drag yourself down!

[Undisputedtruth]

More dull talk, Damian. Verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry borrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrring!

[Undisputedtruth]

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Damian H, you really shouldn't drag yourself down!

Too late for that. Coming on the forum and giving 'hearsay' on the financial crisis. What a sucker.

[Huguenot]

Like, I say twinkle, what's your alternative?

[Otta]

"don't know any better"

This is UDT's label for everyone who disagrees with him. So, that's basically everyone.

[Undisputedtruth]

A fair society where everyone, from road sweepers and up, is recognised for their contribution.

An end to the shift of wealth transfer from the lower/modest incomes to the richest 1%.

[Huguenot]

That's a goal not a solution. How do you propose to meet it?

[Damian H]

forget whether he has the answers - he wouldnt even understand the question. A big word like 'leverage' is as far as he gets and he probably doesn't understand that either.

[Damian H]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A fair society where everyone, from road sweepers

> and up, is recognised for their contribution.

>

> An end to the shift of wealth transfer from the

> lower/modest incomes to the richest 1%.

How about everyone being recognised for their criminality as well?

[Undisputedtruth]

1) Reduce UK's exposure to banks

2) Rather than privatising public sector turn them into co-operatives

3) Invest more in the creativity industries

4) Give NHS freedom from political meddling

5) Give bonuses for success in export markets

6) Reduce taxation levels for the lower to middle incomes as these people are likely to spend more in this country unlike the rich 1% where they would spend elsewhere

7) Better planning policies to incorporate better timeless designs and longevity

8) More financial education.

9) Limitations on banking, CBI, etc lobbying

10) Increasing lobbying representatives for communities and marginalised groups

11) A fairer and open press that doesn't represent the views of a decrepit Aussie

12) Giving Unions the same powers given to Danish Unions

13) Better thought out transport policies that fitsahead of its time

14) Link success of industries to hollistic targets

[Peckhamgatecrasher]

I know nothing about finance but I can't let this go:

Dick & Jane were published by Scott Foresman.

I think you meant to direct UDT to Peter & Jane.

Wouldn't want him to start banging on about Wall Street.

[Huguenot]

That was a copy and paste UDT

[Undisputedtruth]

No it wasn't Hugo. Now get lost.

[Huguenot]

When was the last time you mentioned Danish Unions UDT?

[Otta]

Now lots of those are very good ideas (except number 4, it would be a bloody disaster), but can you honestly see ANY government being able to pull that off?

If you released that as your election manifesto, lots of people would applaud it, and you'd win the votes of many many students, but real people in real jobs, whatever class they belong to, wouldn't be able to vote for you, because of real life.

But redistributing wealth is a noble cause.

[Huguenot]

You can spot a person from their language, it's like a fingerprint, that's not you UDT.

[Otta]

Just to clarify, we'd all love to live in a worl of equality, and stuff, but as long as there are leaders, ther will be rich and poor. Even if the poor overthrew the rich, it would only be a matter of time before the poor became the rich, and it all started again.

[Undisputedtruth]

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When was the last time you mentioned Danish Unions

> UDT?

The last time when I said the Tories nicked most of their policies abroad apart from the Danish policy on unions.

[Damian H]

It's all wonderfully vague wherever it comes from. Utterly meaningless really.

[Undisputedtruth]

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can spot a person from their language, it's

> like a fingerprint, that's not you UDT.

If it was a copy and paste job then you should be able to google the source. Good luck to finding it because the source came from me.

Edited to add: I'm going out so see you all tomorrow for more kick ass action from UDT.

[Huguenot]

I did a search on 'Danish' and can't find your comment UDT?

Re. Your comments...

'Reducing exposure to banks' as point 1 - that was my question, yeah how?

Public Sector is already cooperative, you daft wally.

Investing more in creative is an odd policy commitment, how much more and what do you think the return will be? It's esoteric, hardly working man stuff.

NHS freedom is supposed to do what? Increase expenditure? Decrease? How does that solve banking crisis?

Bonuses already exist for exports. Do you want government to pay them now?

Reduce taxation? *yawn* doesn't everyone?

Better planing designs? WTF? Is this anything to do with anything?

And so on.....

[Huguenot]

I've got a big bucket of monkey UDT and it's all over your hairpiece ;-)

[Undisputedtruth]

Hardly surprising as you are unable to argue fairly without resorting to dirty tricks and dishonest tactics.

I didn't know I had a hairpiece, Hugo. More mud slinging, hey.

[Damian H]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hardly surprising as you are unable to argue

> fairly without resorting to dirty tricks and

> dishonest tactics.

>

> I didn't know I had a hairpiece, Hugo. More mud

> slinging, hey.

Dishonest tactics like facts and evidence. Hmmm, I can understand why you find those challenging UDT.

[Undisputedtruth]

I did find facts and evidence very challenging as there were none in any of your posts. I suggest you put up or shut up. Personally, knowing what I know, I think it's going to be the latter.