Fred Goodwin...sir

[Huguenot]

Good heavens, a threat straight out of Spooks. UDT's an unintelligence operative too!

[Jeremy]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> knowing what I know

Photoshop and Dreamweaver, if I remember correctly.

[katie1997]

And Excel.

Or if you want that in tech-speak (for those of us in the know), that's VBA.

[Undisputedtruth]

Here is some more evidence where the Ordinary Joes were victims of the financial crisis. Come on Damian show me your evidence, you imbecille.

[Otta]

m.guardian.co.uk/money/2011/sep/02/mortgage-application-cheats-hmrc?cat=money&type=article

www.lawsociety.org.uk/productsandservices/practicenotes/mortgagefraud.page

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortgage_fraud

m.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/aug/30/mortgage-fraud-increase?cat=business&type=article

There you go UDT, that should get you started.

[Undisputedtruth]

Otta, you really don't know any better. None of the those links referred to the 2007 financial crisis. What a dope.

[Otta]

www.fsa. gov.uk/.. /mortgage_fraud .pdf

" Mortgage fraud became a feature of the

pre- 2007 lending boom"

There you go, if you need specifics. You really can't read between lines, or understand that it is possible to have more than one guilty party, can you?

What an idiot you are.

Poor thing.

[Otta]

Here's another one. Turns out they're all over the place.

m.moneymarketing.co.uk/160546.article?mobilesite=enabled

They're also reports, rather than just articles about specific cases, which you think constitutes evidence (because you're an idiot).

[Undisputedtruth]

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> www.fsa. gov.uk/.. /mortgage_fraud .pdf

>

> " Mortgage fraud became a feature of the

> pre- 2007 lending boom"

>

> There you go, if you need specifics. You really

> can't read between lines, or understand that it is

> possible to have more than one guilty party, can

> you?

>

> What an idiot you are.

>

> Poor thing.

Of course there was mortgage fraud in the pre-financial crisis. The point I was making is that the Ordinary Joes were victims of the financial crisis, you dope.

[Otta]

You really can't see beyond one simple argument can you. It's quite sweet really.

[Undisputedtruth]

All what you're telling me is that you're unable to some decent research. You also confusing mortgage fraud in the UK with the financial crisis of 2007. Like I said - what a dope.

[Otta]

Is quoting an article from the Telegraph that you found with a quick google search, what we are calling decent research these days?

And the above post doesn't read very clearly for someone who is such a genius.

[Undisputedtruth]

Obviously, my research skills are better than yours. But then I do have a greater understanding of the financial crisis, unlike you.

I do agree that my sentence doesn't always read well and that's because my typing doesn't keep pace with my thinking. You're such a dope, you wouldn't recognise a genius if you saw one.

[Voyageur]

What time are you kids leaving the kindergarten?

[Undisputedtruth]

I'll be happy to move on once Otta accepts he is a dope and a 'don't know any better'.

[katie1997]

Am I the only one who thinks Otta has been really good-humoured and patient, considering the depths of idiocy this thread has sunk to?

[katie1997]

You can't have a decent debate in the drawing room either unless you look past the tabloid-esque thread titles...

[Undisputedtruth]

Katies, your behaviour on this thread isn't a shining example either.

Otta had a problem with me for a very long time and his over-usage of swear words doesn't make good reading as well.

[Voyageur]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta had a problem with me for a very long time.

I think we all have :(

Damn! Have regressed to 11 years old too :( :(

[Undisputedtruth]

Unfortunately, when you have people like Katie and Hugo planting ideas into other people's head then there will be problems.

[*Bob*]

10 PRINT "HUBRIS"

20 GOTO 10

[katie1997]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Katies, your behaviour on this thread isn't a

> shining example either.

I know. Its because if I'm honest, I have forgotten it was supposed to be about Fred the Shred and his Knighthood being redacted. Not a place to show off and brag about my extensive skills with Excel. And Powerpoint.

> Otta had a problem with me for a very long time

> and his over-usage of swear words doesn't make

> good reading as well.

Well, from reading the forum from the outside looking in, it appears that you're the one who has the problem with Otta, not the other way round - and not just on this thread either.

[katie1997]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unfortunately, when you have people like Katie and

> Hugo planting ideas into other people's head then

> there will be problems.

Gosh, what ideas am I supposed to have been planting into other people's heads exactly? What ideas? What people? Go on, I'm really interested in what you have to say. For once.

[Undisputedtruth]

Bob, perhaps there is a certain arrogance on my part when I constantly see stupidness coming from other people. Until people can behave in any reason way then I can't see why I should change my own behaviour. I certainly don't suffer from an overestimation of one's own competence or capabilities so 'Hubris' isn't the right word.

[Otta]

I bet you knew that definition without even looking it up, didn't you?