Jump to content

Recommended Posts

m.guardian.co.uk/money/2011/sep/02/mortgage-application-cheats-hmrc?cat=money&type=article


www.lawsociety.org.uk/productsandservices/practicenotes/mortgagefraud.page


en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortgage_fraud



m.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/aug/30/mortgage-fraud-increase?cat=business&type=article


There you go UDT, that should get you started.

www.fsa. gov.uk/.. /mortgage_fraud .pdf


" Mortgage fraud became a feature of the

pre- 2007 lending boom"


There you go, if you need specifics. You really can't read between lines, or understand that it is possible to have more than one guilty party, can you?


What an idiot you are.


Poor thing.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> www.fsa. gov.uk/.. /mortgage_fraud .pdf

>

> " Mortgage fraud became a feature of the

> pre- 2007 lending boom"

>

> There you go, if you need specifics. You really

> can't read between lines, or understand that it is

> possible to have more than one guilty party, can

> you?

>

> What an idiot you are.

>

> Poor thing.


Of course there was mortgage fraud in the pre-financial crisis. The point I was making is that the Ordinary Joes were victims of the financial crisis, you dope.

Obviously, my research skills are better than yours. But then I do have a greater understanding of the financial crisis, unlike you.


I do agree that my sentence doesn't always read well and that's because my typing doesn't keep pace with my thinking. You're such a dope, you wouldn't recognise a genius if you saw one.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Katies, your behaviour on this thread isn't a

> shining example either.


I know. Its because if I'm honest, I have forgotten it was supposed to be about Fred the Shred and his Knighthood being redacted. Not a place to show off and brag about my extensive skills with Excel. And Powerpoint.


> Otta had a problem with me for a very long time

> and his over-usage of swear words doesn't make

> good reading as well.


Well, from reading the forum from the outside looking in, it appears that you're the one who has the problem with Otta, not the other way round - and not just on this thread either.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unfortunately, when you have people like Katie and

> Hugo planting ideas into other people's head then

> there will be problems.


Gosh, what ideas am I supposed to have been planting into other people's heads exactly? What ideas? What people? Go on, I'm really interested in what you have to say. For once.

Bob, perhaps there is a certain arrogance on my part when I constantly see stupidness coming from other people. Until people can behave in any reason way then I can't see why I should change my own behaviour. I certainly don't suffer from an overestimation of one's own competence or capabilities so 'Hubris' isn't the right word.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Some suggestions for mandatory action might include:- 1. Permit retailers to display facial images on the premises  of previous offenders at their local store. 2. Sound an alert and display images on screens inside the store when the FR flags up a person entering who is on the national database of shoplifters. 3. Physically bar recognised shoplifters from the premises. Should they attempt to force entry then charges should be pressed under aggravated trespass, which  a criminal offence under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. 4. Change the law to allow retailers to have enhanced powers of citizens arrest. What would you suggest? The UK seems to have the most lenient policy towards shoplifting , probably because of other demands on the police force. On the plus side, they may have more time for it now that non-crime hate incidents will no longer be investigated. Other countries, such as the USA have much more sever punishment as does Singapore where repeat offenders or aggravated cases can be sentenced to up to 3 years in prison, a fine, or both.
    • No, we'd have to be in a police state.  You'd have to get this made law.  Unless it is in Reform's policies.  I'll check. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/live-facial-recognition-technology-to-catch-high-harm-offenders Not government policy
    • There is a sign outside what was Megan's saying that whatever is replacing it will have an "all day concept." What the (expletive deleted) is an "all day concept", and how does it differ from being open all day? For (expletive deleted)'s sake 🙄
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...