Jump to content

Recommended Posts

snowy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd imagine if you looked at the funder logos at

> the bottom, that would have answered it for you -

> Mayor of London Office, Transport for London, and

> Excel London as the venue.


(It was a rhetorical question smacking of sarcasm)....who funds the Mayor of London Office, who funds Tfl and who is therefore ultimately going to pay the cost of extra staff etc etc....

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> snowy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'd imagine if you looked at the funder logos

> at

> > the bottom, that would have answered it for you

> -

> > Mayor of London Office, Transport for London,

> and

> > Excel London as the venue.

>

> (It was a rhetorical question smacking of

> sarcasm)....who funds the Mayor of London Office,

> who funds Tfl and who is therefore ultimately

> going to pay the cost of extra staff etc etc....


So now you're objecting to an event designed to show disabled people what's available to help improve their quality of life? You really are a piece of work.

uncleglen Wrote

>

> (It was a racist question smacking of

> bigotry

)....who funds the Mayor of London Office,

> who funds Tfl and who is therefore ultimately

> going to pay the cost of extra staff for an event which is actually quite a good thing but I?ll take any opportunity to have a go at Sadiq because I just don?t like him and there?s nothing conceivable he could do to change my mind etc etc....


Look, Glen mate, have that computer looked at will you? Again I?ve fixed your post, no charge, but it keeps posting something different to what you really wanted to write. I?m abusy guy and I can?t be constantly checking your work. Maybe use the ?preview? function first?


Have a good day!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Very happy to add my recommendation for Leon, who has now helped me out twice. Prompt, efficient and helpful.
    • Today we are seeing the impact of increased taxes (employers NI) with tje UK unemployment rate rising  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxrp7znkdlo Unfortunately, to increase tax burdens will see the economy stall or a recession, as Angelina says, cutting spending, whilst painful short term, is a good way to bring down government borrowing.  True, we don't want to see cuts to services but there are other areas of government spending that can be reduced and with AI impacting all jobs across all businesses, maybe it will also reduce overall staffing costs. 
    • or cut costs.  The cost of debt is a huge burden, it cannot be increased.
    • Yes, they should clearly have been more honest on taxes before the election and not backed themselves into a corner. After 14 years of mismanagement and decline, they have to invest and at the same time start to bring borrowing down (otherwise they continues to be at the mercy of the bond markets). Continued cuts / degrading of public services is counter productive (a successful economy and society needs good infrastructure, education and health care).  The single biggest thing they could do to immediately improve growth would be to rejoin the single market, but I appreciate that is difficult politically.  So if you can't significantly boost growth short term, can't cut too much further, and need to raise money without borrowing, that only really leaves taxation.    Of course, where best to target those taxes - that's the real question.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...