Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am sick & tired of the P13 bus-stops in Underhill Road being repeatably closed, and I?m not the only one, judging by the following message posted on one of these bus stops :?The ***holes have done it again!'.

This time it is due to a burst water-main, and I can?t help but wonder if Thames Water damaged this water-main themselves when carrying out the works that closed Underhill Road last week!


I also note that TFL no longer put the ?Bus Stop Closed? notice on the flag,so that even disabled and elderly people have to take, what to them, could be a long walk to find out the bus-stop is closed.


Is it really worth having a P13 bus route serving Underhill Road nwhen P13 users are constantly persecuted in this way?

What the Hell have we done to make Thames Water, TFL etc dislike us so much! Indeed ? is it really worth living in Dulwich?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/221156-p13-bus-route-underhill-road/
Share on other sites

I agree! This has to be the 6th or 7th time that the P13 (which I rely upon daily) is on diversion.


And yes! They've given up even announcing it, or signposting it. The last three days, I've had to wait up to 30 minutes (in the rain with two young kids) for the bus. It's maddening.


I am also at my wit's end!

The diverted route is Underhill till Barry road, right to onto Barry road, Left onto Lordship Lane, then returns to ususal route, right at the Grove Tavern.


As others have said it's an absolute inconvenience, especially for coming back from DKH. Why can't they just allocate more workman to do all the works in one go when it is closed or actually plan the works.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...