Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The train services now are pretty good.

>

> If you remember the disastrous implementation of

> the last timetabling amendments it might make you

> think we should be grateful for what we have now !


I wouldn't call just 2 trains an hour from Denmark Hill to St.Pancras during rush hour, that you can't board because they're so over-crowded, as "pretty good".

TfL's proposal for us that use the Forest Hill line is to increase the Southern trains into London Bridge to six trains per hour and increase East London Overground trains to West Croydon and Crystal Palace to 6 per hour, which will see a massive increase in trains to going north and reinstate the missing two trains axed when the Overground was introduced off-peak.


There would also be additional platforms at Brockley to allow passengers to use Southeastern trains to Victoria, Lewisham and SE London.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was that the Hare Krishna place? I can't remember exactly where it was (or maybe still is) but it was somewhere around Oxford Street.
    • The "for sale" section on this forum lets people offer things for free or cheaply. And the "wanted" section let's people ask for things they want or need, for free or cheaply. There are also existing schemes like Freecycle, and also local  food banks. And there is (or was) a local scheme where you can bring things to be repaired free. I think it is/was based in Nunhead. Isn't that simpler than having a barter system? You might have something to give away, but the person who wants it might not have anything you want. Or have I misunderstood how it works? I can see that offering services free might not fit into existing schemes, but depending on what they were, what would happen if things went horribly wrong eg someone wrecked your house? Sorry if the above sounds very negative. 
    • I'm wondering why they would do that? Because surely positive reviews could only help them, and if they thought they might get negative reviews, shouldn't they have been addressing the reasons that might be (unless someone had an unwarranted grudge against them)? But in any case, how could they have stopped people posting reviews on here? PS I have corrected your typo! 😃
    • Agreed. Just stating as a historic fact they tried to stiffle reviews.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...