Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Our 6 month old son as been weaned since 15 weeks (as we are in a clinical trial involving early weaning...a whole other thread) he has happily been eating pur?es for 3 meals a day until 1 1/2 weeks ago, now he's refusing all but about a spoon of food at each meal... Any experience of this and advice of what to do (apart from grinning at him like a muppet three times a day and sampling some delightful pur?es myself?!!) tried some finger food this weekend without much interest....
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22184-food-refusal/
Share on other sites

I think this is fairly common, certainly my first child (weaned 17w) did just that


It was a bit like the novelty wore off/he developed an independent streak that he has to this day


I think you will have to

Persist with the finger foods/look into blw


I have found with all of mine they loved to copy me - so offer him things and eat them yourself .... Plus try him with a tommee tippee cup, no

Lid, with a few blueberries in, or an inch of pur?e and a spoon to self feed


Baby Bjorn round plastic spoons (Amazon) are pricey but very good for early self feeding


You can also serve pur?es with pasta spirals, if ready to start wheat (or get corn pasta)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22184-food-refusal/#findComment-525856
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
how is your boy getting on? I started my first child on purees at about 5 months, and even then I got some remarks about how this was too early, but it worked for her. For a few reasons, I would like to start my new baby on purees a bit earlier - about 4 months. I am just wondering how you are now getting on, and weather 4 months is a bit early. Thanks, Lucy
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22184-food-refusal/#findComment-529659
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...