Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This was posted last night on East Dulwich Mums facebook page.

I'm often up there with our dog but haven't see these two......



I just wanted to warn anyone who may go to Peckham Rye Park with their dog at around 7pm at night about a lady and her dogs that we encountered tonight.


She had two black and white collies, one of which attacked my dog - She has a puncture wound on her face and also a punctured ear - I shall spare the pictures as they?re grim.


As she walked away she smugly said ?And that?s why my dog doesn?t like staffies?


Not once did she warn us about her dog as she saw us approaching with our dog, she didn?t have a lead with her and she didn?t try to tell her dog to stop.


Please be wary if you walk your dog around there at around that time, especially if you have a Staffy.

I agree with rahrahrah, there seems to be an out of control dog pretty much every week, if not more often.


My live-in boyfriend was attacked by a small black dog just over six months ago now (on Peckham Rye park) and he's still feeling the effects (i.e. very reluctant to go within a 30-40 metre radius of any dog, which makes taking joint walks together very difficult indeed!)


In my view, the park should not allow dog owners to have dogs off their leads, except in some very tightly defined areas. Perhaps rather like the picnic area in the park specifically prohibits dogs, there could be a similar sized area where dog owners can keep take their dogs.

I have walked everyday in local parks for the past seven years and have not seen an incident such as this.

These are horrible but unusual incidents -which absolutely should not be disregarded.


Irresponsible dog owners are a pain for ALL park users and i would be delighted for them to be held to account


However thousands of dog owners have lovely uneventful walks everyday - so a bit nervous of draconian on lead laws.

It's a matter of control and responsibility, surely? Make dog owners (or walkers) responsible for the actions of their dogs, so that they could be personally arrested and charged for assault if their dogs attacked someone - the dog being treated as a weapon in the control of their owner/ walker and it will be up to them how much control they wish to display, either through good training or through a lead. If their dog attacks another dog they should similarly be treated as the agent of that attack - as if they had attacked the other dog. And the police should treat dog attacks as assault - the 'weapon' might well be seized and destroyed, but the proximate wielder of that weapon - the person nominally in charge of the dog, should be the target of arrest and prosecution in no different manner than if the dog had been a knife or club used to attack someone.
There is plenty of existing legislation (criminal and civil) to enable human victims and police to take action in circumstances described- though police are often ignorant of the legislation. Taking action in regard to serious attacks on other dogs is more difficult. I agree that advocating an on lead policy for all dogs other than in tiny areas is not the way to go. The issue here is antisocial owners.

I doubt the police have the resources to follow up - is this something that the park rangers can enforce?

Perhaps having the issue raised on the Park noticeboards and a procedure to follow if this happens?


Basically, raising awareness and encouraging witnesses to come forward, take photos and seeking to charge the owners.


It really should not go ignored.


And I don't think reducing the areas dogs can walk off-lead is the answer.

Hi Jules-and-Boo,


Interestingly, my partner did this - he even got a video of the dog owner to take to the police. Since the video only showed the woman walking with her dog (and not the attack itself), the police wouldn't do anything.


first mate - we found it difficult to get police action, since Police viewed the dog as not a 'dangerous dog'. From my second-hand understanding (via my stressed partner), it seemed the police seemed far more interested in what breed/type of dog it was rather than it's behaviour, which just seemed weird to me.


CE

I don't know - the lady who reported it didn't say anything further.


Very few dogs in the park last night, but very lovely out.


I haven't seen anything but I do know of people who won't got to PRP or the one in Camberwell, that also has reported dog attacks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This presumably hasn't been done by vandals. It's hardly a Sycamore Gap situation. So if it's been done by professionals, unless it was a mistake (unlikely) there must have been a good reason, as it would have cost money. It would perhaps have been a good idea to put a notice on the tree explaining why such drastic work was done, but usually (I think) it would be either because of disease (often not noticeable on the surface) or that the roots or branches  were endangering nearby structures. As already said, nobody on here is likely to know. The tree department in Southwark Council are helpful in my (admittedly limited) experience. Please post on here when you have found out, as I agree what's left of the tree looks pretty odd. Depending on why the work was done, possibly they intend to remove the rest as well?
    • I have a very stupid question. I want to get a SIM card to put in an old mobile as a back up,  in case despite my best efforts my mobile gets stolen and I have no way of contacting anybody quickly, eg banks. Can I just buy any old cheap pay as you go  SIM card and put say ten pounds on it and it will then be fine for years (with the phone kept charged!) even if I don't use it, or do I have to use the phone  every so often to keep the SIM card valid?
    • I hate to see trees cut down to such an unfinished state. Unless the tree is home to wildlife, an effort should be made to remove & replace. Otherwise, it's just so useless & unsightly.
    • Given the level of care in Dulwich Park, I would not expect this to be careless or unnecessary. It will grow back.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...