Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

We are going to Cambodia with our 11 month old (or he will be at the time)

I'm planning to buy a pushchair for the trip which involves a few other places but Cambodia is the roughest, pram-wise.

We will use a sling for the sights but would like a pram for sleeps, around the streets of the towns etc.

I'm looking at the micralite Superlite - if you have any experience of this pram over rough / bumpy terrain I'd be interested to hear how you got on.

Or recommendations of other prams you know of.

Thanks in advance.

I have a Superlite and love it. It's light, gorgeous and the pumped up tyres mean it's good over bumps. I've recently been using a Maclaren Quest, which is even smaller and much easier to fold and carry, but a bit rattly in comparison. You're welcome to test drive the Superlite if that helps.

I don't know whether the countries you are visiting are going to be very hot, but the problem I have always found with light travel strollers are that the sunshade on them is a bit rubbish (it certainly is on the quest!). We went to Australia with our then 8m old and took the baby jogger city mini as it folds really easily, pretty light, reclines flat and has an awesome sunhood. The new gt version sounds even better as it is basically the city mini with forever air (so non puncture) tyres and an adjustable handlebar...


http://www.babybabyonline.co.uk/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/g/t/gt_crimson_1.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...