Jump to content

Sinister anti-CPZ posters in shop windows


Recommended Posts

Parking permits made them ?3.6m last year

Pay and display another ?3.7m

Penalty Charge Notices a whopping ?6.2m


And remember, none of these charges (like the garden bin tax) are covered by the same increase limits that the Council Tax is - these charges fall outside any central government caps on tax increases. Over time the Council will move to generate all the revenue that needs to spend on area such as roads to direct, uncapped, 'taxation' allowing them to divert monies that should have been spent in these areas to their pet projects. Just because a revenue source is hypothecated does not mean that monies which would otherwise be spent in this area need to be, it's a way of diverting capped funds elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Penguin68 to that point the report is very revealing as well....


From the ?6m surplus made last year ?5.8m of that was spent on road maintenance. And since 2011/2012 road maintenance costs have risen from ?1.7m in 2011/2012 to last year's ?5.8m figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone is getting very well remunerated for road repairs/replacement, step forward Conway et al, now you know where the money goes. The rich get richer and the poor become poorer or are driven out of area because they can no longer afford council stealth taxes. So is it any wonder the traders have taken the fight on directly rather than rolling over like pussies. Good on you LL traders, keep the fight up.


And at the same time a minority bang on about what they want rather than considering what benefits the area. It is said that by 2014 all petrol and diesel vehicles will no longer be permitted and only electric vehicles will be able to use the roads. For that the authorities will need to produce more electricity to charge up the vehicles. NOW I ask, WHERE does that power come from, oh yes gas and coal etc. so as much as people will no longer be able to use internal combustion engines, the green lobby are hypocritical.


Look what happened with plastic, it was cheap to produce and use, then the green lobby opposed plastic and it is gradually (very gradually) being eliminated. And what are we returning to, PAPER, just like was used nearly 80 years ago. It is funny that what fell out of favour is returning because in makes environmental sense. And had we not been diverted to plastic the oceans and its creatures would not be contaminated with the stuff. Rant over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

edanna Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it?s exorbitant rents that are the biggest

> risk to independents.



Business rates too, something that I can help reduce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...