Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There have been so many threads on this over the years. I'm at a loss as to how it can be improved. My in laws come to visit from a Sussex town with high dog ownership, and they constantly remark at the shocking amount of dog poo on the ground in dulwich.


It's a public health hazard, and with so many young kids in the area as well, makes it double concerning given how they love to walk, run, put hands on ground, pick up rubbish off the floor etc


I always keep an eagle eye out for dog walkers in our street, ready to give them a gobful if they let their dog 'do the dirty' and don't pick it up....but they're crafty, and while the evidence is always on display, I never see the event occur....it's like we have an army of dog poo Bansky's in the area......

At last a thread that is really useful. It's important to monitor your bowel movements particularly later in life, and a great topic of conversation. Wait, not human ones? Dogs? How dull. Round may way less of a problem, and I expect it is the occasional dog owner as most seem to pick it up. Foxes more of an issue (squidgy)
Just arrived home to find a huge dollop of canine poo right in middle of pavement outside my drive. Huge! Must have been left between 6pm and 8pm so pretty brazen not to pick up in broad daylight. Have to say it's unusual to have dog poo left on our street though. We used to have a poo bin on a lamp post at end of street but it kept getting nicked and the council refused to replace it in the end... Weird.
This is just an idea to help: while walking along a rural back street I noticed a homemade sign on a tree asking dog owners to pick up their dog?s faeces. The sign was obviously made by children and was colourful and had a message that appealed to one?s humanity. I thought it was a good idea because it had a sense of community and asked dog owners to be caring rather than threatening them with fines. How effective I do not know, but I cannot see any harm in this approach to resolving the problem.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nice idea though it is, I doubt it would have any

> effect. Those who allow their dogs to poo without

> picking up have little relationship with their

> environment or with the community and the message

> of the poster would be unlikely to register let

> alone acted upon.


I understand your sentiment but there is no harm in trying. And even though it may not resonate with the perpetrators it may give a sense of community to others. For example, even though I collect my dog's faeces reading such a sign showed me people do care about their community.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...