Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jelly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @Saffron

>

> Steady on there, 007. The risks outweight the

> positives, and if you "think" that snapping

> ordinary members of the public, however 'shifty'

> they might look, should be done from a distance,

> then you should've said so in the beginning seeing

> as you're the one who suggested such a bizarre

> measure against people who still remain innocent

> of anything except rousing your own suspicions.

> What you're encouraging is a more intrusive

> measure than CCTV, without official sanction. It

> would be against the law and could potentially

> leave you vulnerable to litigation served by an

> aggrieved party who objects to being photographed

> in public by an anxious and/or paranoid

> pedestrian. How would you react if you saw someone

> secretly or "serreptitiously" taking pictures of

> another member of the public who you didn't feel

> threatened by? One can only assume that you'd

> think the worst. Sorry, but the risks do outweigh

> the positives. By quite a lot, in fact.



Come here, jelly, let me take your picture. Muhahahahahahahaha.

But seriously, I have had a stalker. It was many years ago before camera phones were available. If it ever happened to me again, I wouldn't hesitate to get photographic evidence. There is no law about photographing individuals in public in this country. If you've seen someone acting suspiciously towards you on more than one occasion, then it's worth doing something about it. What you chose to do is of course entirely up to you. Doing nothing b/c you're afraid of upsetting an innocent person, or b/c you're afraid of how people will perceive you as being paranoid, ill-mannered, etc is ignoring an opportunity to protect yourself. xx

Ladies and Gents, I get really upset and annoyed when I see these kind of comments from some one that thinks the way mfcjoe does, that kind of person is a Danger to society as much as the man in the park, where is his humanity ? If a women member or male for that matter on this forum is writing about a serious issue like this one its because she truly felt scared and fearfull for her young family, what an heartless person you must be mfcjoe, im wondering if you have any Family yourself ????

All except for you find this incident really disturbing, any decent person would find it very alarming .

Thanks leanne I hope you get the support u need with your ordeal.

As for mfcjoe... Ever heard the saying " What goes around Comes Around ?

  • 3 weeks later...
discovered the Moulin today when walking to the Plough. Le Moulin was ?12.50 for 3 delicious courses compared with ?13 just for a main in the PLough. Great service too, but it doesn't look much from the outside so most people probably walk past it, as I have done many times!

Cas59 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladies and Gents, I get really upset and annoyed

> when I see these kind of comments from some one

> that thinks the way mfcjoe does, that kind of

> person is a Danger to society as much as the man

> in the park, where is his humanity ? If a women

> member or male for that matter on this forum is

> writing about a serious issue like this one its

> because she truly felt scared and fearfull for her

> young family, what an heartless person you must be

> mfcjoe, im wondering if you have any Family

> yourself ????

> All except for you find this incident really

> disturbing, any decent person would find it very

> alarming .

> Thanks leanne I hope you get the support u need

> with your ordeal.

> As for mfcjoe... Ever heard the saying " What goes

> around Comes Around ?


You are nuts, yes i do have kids and they are very street wise. I hope you don't have kids cos with your genetics they will no

doubt be loonies. You are a complete bread and butter, ciao.

You should ring the police if you're concerned or take a photo of him on your mobile but make sure you are not on your own. There may be an innocent reason for this but in this day and age you cannot be too careful. If you are with other you could always confront him.

postboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You should ring the police if you're concerned or take a photo of him on your mobile but make sure

> you are not on your own. There may be an innocent reason for this but in this day and age you cannot

> be too careful. If you are with other you could always confront him.


For what??? Honestly, this is the equivalent of some thug in a boozer going, 'you lookin' at my missus'?


Don't confront people that are not actually doing anything wrong. How would you like it? Let's all go down to the playground next weekend and confront each and every person with children and get them to prove they are theirs. Unless they are carrying documentary proof that they are actually the parents of the children, we could detain them all and call in the police and social services.


You can't be too careful you know...

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> postboy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You should ring the police if you're concerned

> or take a photo of him on your mobile but make

> sure

> > you are not on your own. There may be an

> innocent reason for this but in this day and age

> you cannot

> > be too careful. If you are with other you could

> always confront him.

>

> For what??? Honestly, this is the equivalent of

> some thug in a boozer going, 'you lookin' at my

> missus'?

>

> Don't confront people that are not actually doing

> anything wrong. How would you like it? Let's all

> go down to the playground next weekend and

> confront each and every person with children and

> get them to prove they are theirs. Unless they are

> carrying documentary proof that they are actually

> the parents of the children, we could detain them

> all and call in the police and social services.

>

> You can't be too careful you know...


Well said Loz.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...