Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is it just me or are there others of the same opinion? This work ethic nonsense is a con to trick the low classes to be subservient to the educated rich! They want you to bow and scrape, except minimum wage to enslave you to a poverty trap. Really, think about it. since the industrial revolution started we have all been sold a crock of shite, work all the hours God sends, scrape by, make do and humbly go cap in hand for a piss poor pay-packet. Them we had self serving unions who after doing a reasonable job of freeing the children from the chimney sweeps and such like. now the rich have crippled their effectiveness, we are now all in this together, Ha bloody Ha. All this great new advances in technology has freed the worker from his labour-intense past and succeeded in reducing him into unemployment! Great innit?

Then we are labelled as work shy, even though we've retrained and up-skilled. The unemployed should go on strike! Demand a re-brand "WE ARE THE LEISURE CLASS"

Never forgive never forget...born to rule - Cleggster my ass needs wiping run along and get the moist wipes - what's the odds Huhne gets off a custodial because he knows too much. Good to see Gorgeous George is back to pour some bile down their necks.


http://k-punk.abstractdynamics.org/archives/cameron-bullingdon-club.jpg

I think the level of intransigence in our society curbs and curtails the true levels of work actually done. we really need numerous holistic based techniques to truly meet the greater need for the greater good. if ever the new is to replace the old, then surely the time is now? various arrays of nefarious thinkers have done nothing but fail us. only by taking a aggressive stance to the lessons of history will we ever understand the true nature of the total gaps in the field of knowledge.


the inconsequential have failed us.

It seems to be a logical developmental step that the repetitive and uninspiring tasks of agriculture and manufacturing should be automated.


I had the misfortune of working in a car indicator light factory for many months, and anyone who thinks that's better than unemployment is engaging in a ridiculously idealised view of society, compounded by a lack of imagination.


The challenge is to create other lifetime objectives than those espoused by dysfunctional throwbacks who believe that being on a toilet production line in the 1950s is the only ambition to emulate.


Terrifying as it may seem, the future of humanity and our current society is in the delivery of services - particularly in entertainment, media and the arts.


So the rise of reality television is a stepping stone on that path, or a mis-step depending upon your perspective. It's defining everyday tasks like paper sales companies and entrepreneurial business in terms of their entertainment value rather than their productivity.


We should probably stop taking ourselves so seriously, and crowbar our proletariat down from their bronzed pedestals.


Marx has a lot to answer for.


;-) how was that, right-clicking?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...