Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is it just me or are there others of the same opinion? This work ethic nonsense is a con to trick the low classes to be subservient to the educated rich! They want you to bow and scrape, except minimum wage to enslave you to a poverty trap. Really, think about it. since the industrial revolution started we have all been sold a crock of shite, work all the hours God sends, scrape by, make do and humbly go cap in hand for a piss poor pay-packet. Them we had self serving unions who after doing a reasonable job of freeing the children from the chimney sweeps and such like. now the rich have crippled their effectiveness, we are now all in this together, Ha bloody Ha. All this great new advances in technology has freed the worker from his labour-intense past and succeeded in reducing him into unemployment! Great innit?

Then we are labelled as work shy, even though we've retrained and up-skilled. The unemployed should go on strike! Demand a re-brand "WE ARE THE LEISURE CLASS"

Never forgive never forget...born to rule - Cleggster my ass needs wiping run along and get the moist wipes - what's the odds Huhne gets off a custodial because he knows too much. Good to see Gorgeous George is back to pour some bile down their necks.


http://k-punk.abstractdynamics.org/archives/cameron-bullingdon-club.jpg

I think the level of intransigence in our society curbs and curtails the true levels of work actually done. we really need numerous holistic based techniques to truly meet the greater need for the greater good. if ever the new is to replace the old, then surely the time is now? various arrays of nefarious thinkers have done nothing but fail us. only by taking a aggressive stance to the lessons of history will we ever understand the true nature of the total gaps in the field of knowledge.


the inconsequential have failed us.

It seems to be a logical developmental step that the repetitive and uninspiring tasks of agriculture and manufacturing should be automated.


I had the misfortune of working in a car indicator light factory for many months, and anyone who thinks that's better than unemployment is engaging in a ridiculously idealised view of society, compounded by a lack of imagination.


The challenge is to create other lifetime objectives than those espoused by dysfunctional throwbacks who believe that being on a toilet production line in the 1950s is the only ambition to emulate.


Terrifying as it may seem, the future of humanity and our current society is in the delivery of services - particularly in entertainment, media and the arts.


So the rise of reality television is a stepping stone on that path, or a mis-step depending upon your perspective. It's defining everyday tasks like paper sales companies and entrepreneurial business in terms of their entertainment value rather than their productivity.


We should probably stop taking ourselves so seriously, and crowbar our proletariat down from their bronzed pedestals.


Marx has a lot to answer for.


;-) how was that, right-clicking?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...