Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if anyone knows how many times a day one needs to breastfeed in order to have lowered levels of oestrogen? Is lowered oestrogen something that lasts say for two hours after a feed? (for example)


If a breastfeeding mother needed to increase her levels of oestrogen (not to conceive) but didn't want to give up breastfeeding completely would this be possible? Or would she need to give up completely?

My midwife told me that once feeds are consistently more than three hours apart, ovulation was more more likely. (I don't know on what she was basing that, maybe just experience.) I would infer from this that there is a threshold level for prolactin production in order supress oestrogen, but that's likely to differ greatly among women b/c every mother-baby dyad is different.


I've no idea about oestrogen kinetics immediately post-breastfeed, but judging by how hormones systems run in general, I would guess there are small, acute cycles of rising and falling oestrogen on a background of very low, slowly rising oestrogen over a period of many months when babies are demand-fed and slowly weaned. This could possibly be very different in the case of scheduled feeding or abrupt weaning.


You could increase oestrogen by consuming a diet high in natural oestrogens, but the result might be that you interfer with prolactin to the extent that breastfeeding is compromised.


Is it the symptoms of low eostrogen that you're trying to address (fatigue, insomnia, night sweats)?

A friend needs to increase her Oestrogen levels prior to an operation, is already on oestrogen supplements but is worried that if she is still breast feeding when the call up for the op comes they'll refuse to do in on the grounds that it's success is unlikely if oestrogen levels are low
I think she really needs to have interim blood work done to check hormone levels, if there is a real likelihood that she might be refused on grounds of low oestrogen. Is the surgery to correct uterine prolapse (increased oestrogen thought to help this) or similar? Would a pessary hormone ring provide better local uptake of oestrogen w/o excessive systemic exposure, thereby limiting the likelihood of interfering with b/fing?

Stitches were done well according to doc but there may have been grazes that were missed and have healed with the stitches, so in effect she has been stitched up too much! Needs re-cutting and stitching..:(

She has localised cream to apply apparently but I will suggest she discuss the bloods with whoever she is dealing with, thanks a lot for the links too Saffron

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...