Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17769929


Planned births at home and in midwifery units are more cost-effective than giving birth in hospital, particularly for women who have given birth before, University of Oxford research suggests.


For women having their first baby, however, planned home birth was more risky for the baby but still the most cost-effective option.





BMJ here: http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2292

One criticism of the study though - it didn't look at the cost of pre-natal care, it seems that you get a lot more care from a smaller team of midwives if you opt for a home birth, this presumably would add to the costs. My NCT teacher advised my whole class to claim we wanted home births even if we didn't just so we'd get better antenatal care (we could pretend to chicken out at the last minute if we really wanted to go to hospital!)
dulwichgirl2, the recently published and very comprehensive 'Birthplace study' results find that for a low risk woman having a second or subsequent baby a planned homebirth is a safer option than having her baby in an obstetric unit, and as safe as the safest option - a midwife led unit. Sadly the safest option for birth - midwife led unit- is not one that's to be made available to the women of ED, unless they travel to central London or to Lewisham. And it's not looking likely that it will be available any time soon in the future either. :(
I thought it was interesting that the BBC article chose to emphasize the homebirth aspect (hence the title), but that the research itself emphasized also the importance of midwife-led birthing units. It seemed to me that the BBC article was fishing for an eye-catching or contraversial headline, a bit at the expense of emphasizing the importance of midwife-led units (or the lack thereof).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
    • Is it lame? Or is it Lamey? (sorry)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...