Jump to content

Good Management Companies Block of Flats


Kris123

Recommended Posts

Hi East Dulwich!


It would be great if anyone out there has some relevant experience to offer some advice regarding management companies of blocks of flats.


Myself and 3 other directors look after a large block of flats in West Norwood. We have employed a management company to do the work that we are unable to do (serve breach of lease notices, collect service charges, handle accounts etc) but this particular company are a nightmare when it comes to getting any works done (they seemingly have their own set of preferred contractors who are 10 times the cost of others that could do the same jobs). They are also naff at communicating (are based overseas and not easy to contact) and charge a very high service charge.


We know that logistically we couldn?t realistically handle a right to manage set up as there are over 50 flats and landlords but we do want more control over who does what in this relationship (so management company or individual looks after accounting and serving notices whilst we look after picking contractors or firms to do works).


Has anyone out there been in a similar situation or know of a good management company that are local and have a flexible approach to building management? Or does anyone know of an independent individual who would do this kind of work with directors of blocks?


Your input would be very much appreciated!


Thanks


Kristian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boo hoo, poor you!


Sounds like you and your 3 'directors' cant be arsed to do much work yourself, but fancy more profit out of this little venture, so you are asking for a better, cheaper alternative. Perhaps you should do your own homework? Thats of course if you arent too busy sat on your arse counting the income from these properties, whilst deciding on who the next unfortunate is to be served with a breach of lease notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't these be people who represent the former 'leaseholders' of a property who have bought-out the freehold and are now managing the property themselves (very common occurrence nowadays). Typically the former leaseholders form a company to manage the property on their own behalf, electing some to be 'directors'. Some of the beneficial owners may well now sublet their old apartments - hence reference to 'landlords'. I doubt whether profit here is a motive, but keeping down the costs of joint ownership, while maintaining a well run apartment block.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Penguin, I am a leaseholder in a block of flats and we have a residents company with appointed directors - they take no fee and are other leaseholders within the block.The leasholders either live there or sublet to tenants.


There is a block Landlord to whom we (all leasholders) pay rent.


The Managing agent acts on behalf of the Residents company to bring in contractors to do communal maintenance. It is these guys he wants to change.


The only company I have dealt with (outside Dulwich Estate) is Remus Management who while not brilliant are at least in the UK (Brighton) ad will visit and take instruction / or use any contractors that directors suggest and there is a relationship in place


W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Rockets, its obvious that Dulvilleres 🙈🙉🙊
    • DulvilleRes...is this correct - did the Chair make that threat?
    • I had one delivered off the back of this thread and would say that, while it's marginally better than the likes of Dominoes and Papa Johns and better value, it's very much in the vein of that sort of pizza. Dough seemed like it had been bought in and is definitely not of the sourdough variety. The sauce was very sweet and overall the flavour wasn't amazing. Not terrible but not a patch on the likes of Yard Sale or more authentic independent pizzerias.
    • The trustees of Dulwich Society reported a huge surge in membership in the weeks leading up to the Special General Meeting. Who these new members were, it is hard to say. However, if the influx was in support of the group of Dulwich Society members looking to extend their influence via the SGM, it failed; they were comprehensively outvoted. Whether co incidental or not, there is a heavy overlap of names between this minority grouping within the Society, and local activists in anti LTN issues. Were they One Dulwich? With an organisation as opaque and unaccountable as One Dulwich are – in stark contrast to the Dulwich Society – it is hard to say. it constantly surprises me that One Dulwich's cheerleaders on this forum seem to know nothing about how they are run, or crucially who funds them. It is hard to take these cheerleaders seriously when they seem unable or unwilling to ask or answer basic questions such as this. I found it extraordinary that this grouping in Dulwich Society pushing for change refused to meet with the trustees to discuss their concerns, opting instead for an expensive Special General Meeting; this indicates to me a certain kind of needlessly combative approach to what is fundamentally an apolitical local charity. This perception was reinforced by the conduct of some supporters of this grouping in the room – hectoring, aggressive and ultimately unneighbourly, and certainly a hostility you wouldn’t want to tolerate in any organisation.  Whilst I can’t talk for the trustees, as regards resigning, if they took the view that actually something extraordinary was happening to much loved local institution that was best dealt with by the Charity Commission, I wouldn’t blame them.  But the end result was in my view a triumph for local democracy. The modernising of the Society’s rules that the trustees supported, giving the possibility of a degree of protection from online trolling for volunteers working on traffic issues, and making the Dulwich Society more inclusive by having the possibility of online General meetings are most welcome.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...