Jump to content

Recommended Posts

'Ethical' is such a vague term that it is an imposs question to answer in its current form. I know that a company has listed on the LSE offering Sharia compliant investment. Is that what you had in mind? Or do you mean a bank that doesn't invest in condom manufacturers? Or once that uses recycled paper? Or one that doesn't kill whales? I know of a couple of so-called ethical funds in the City that have invested in stuff that would amaze their shareholders.

martin


You seem to have a one-track mind on the forum about financial matters.... you must be interested in other things??


as for ethical banking, I agree with Dom. I would start with transparent banking as a wish - then I could have a look at the "ethics" behind some of the investments/decisions

I bank with Smile, who are part of the Co-Operative and they say this: We have a strict ethical policy, which means your money stays squeaky clean. We do work to help the environment such as sourcing 98% of our electricity from renewable sources. And, we work in our local communities. We don't do this at the expense of our rates though, so you can enjoy a warm feeling inside as we take care of your heart and your wallet.


There are also banks like Triodos, but they are more for saving.

embellina


Smile/Co-op came to my mind as well, but a mission statement isn't the same as reality. I did applaud them when they told a Christian group to take their money elsewhere when they tried to close down Jerry Spinger: The Opera


But if you were a Christian who shared the group's views rather than the co-ops you might have a different view on "ethics"


http://www.christianvoice.org.uk/Press/press001.html

Agreed, Sean. Do they not abide by their mission statement, then? Maybe I'm too naive. I do feel it's better to go with a so-called ethical bank though as surely they do more than a high street bank built on the profits of slavery (and enslaving us to their bank charges and wicked ways!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...