Jump to content

Recommended Posts

well, she could, Pickle, she could easily go out and leave a grown man to make himself some lunch. The fact that she doesn't is up to her, surely?? (or even leave him a sandwich, if she was feeling charitable?)


I wonder how many of us will manage to bring up our children to all help around the house, or will it somehow end up being the girls helping mum whilst the boys play games with dad . . .

I'm rather proud of the fact that my son is obsessed with cleaning and vacuuming. He always wants to help, especially if it involves spraying some sort of claening product and then wiping it up! He's 3, and I'm hoping this will last. He also like to help cook.


I've tried very hard to get him to help with my chores and Daddy's chores, and to understand what we do when we're out of the house during the day. My OH is a gardener and I'm an office worker, so he obviously prefers Daddy's job to mine at the moment.


My daughter is only just 1, but she's going to have to start "helping" around the house soon too :)


I don't think that there's any reason we have to perpetuate gender stereotypes into the next generation.

It's instilled at such a young age


Such as giving the girls 'slave-toys' like mini hoovers and kitchens etc and not the boys


Girls wanting to play with slave-toys more cos they're watching their mum and wanting to be like her


So all stems on our examples however subtle

oimissus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well, she could, Pickle, she could easily go out

> and leave a grown man to make himself some lunch.

> The fact that she doesn't is up to her, surely??

> (or even leave him a sandwich, if she was feeling

> charitable?)

>

You're right, there's nothing stopping her really, but after 17 years of marriage (they got married at 21) she can't see that. Frustrates the hell out of me when I visit her!


I have another friend at home whose husband arrived home at 5pm when I was there visiting her. She had a 3 day old baby and a 16 month old toddler and, in front of me, he shouted at her because his dinner wasn't on the table. Not good.


So ladies, celebrate these partners that do little bits to help :))

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's true. My 3 year old daughter's preschool is

> having a "pirates & princesses" party. We will be

> sending her as a pirate!


Have you said anything to other Mums or the school? I'd be horrified if my son's preschool did anything segregated like that.

it's not actually segregated, though, is it - nothing to say that boys HAVE to be pirates and girls HAVE to be princesses, though I bet more girls would go as a pirate than boys go as a princess. How much of that is actually coming from parents? Enlightened, educated parents who wouldn't dream of dressing their sons in 'girls' costumes, or buy their sons 'girls' toys?


sorry, Ole, this has strayed off the point of your original post - enjoying the discussion though!


(edited to correct crap spelling)

So - back to the original post. My OH has just reminded me about "role reversal week". Evey now and again (OK, when I b**ch and nag at him) he proposes that we have a role reversal for a week and do each other's chores, childcare duties etc.


I am then reminded that although he spends less time on chores, he does do all the things that I hate doing. And we merrily go back to the system that we have evolved over 13 years of living together, which does actually suit us even if I sometimes feel put-upon.


Ole - worth a try in your house? Not sure how it will work out if you can't swap childcare roles as well...

well, I arrived home and he had cooked enough meals to last us through the week (he was 'working from home' today), went to the local shop and stocked up on essentials, and right now in front of me is sorting through 2 years worth of his own paperwork. Gotta throw strops at him more often.


Today I have learnt that:


1. Need to lower expectations as it is a well-known fact that few men can think outside the box anyway

2. Men need to be told what to do and to ignore their sulky faces

3. Ignore their mess and create a mess of my own to make a point

4. If something does not get done then it is OK, the world is not going to stop spinning

5. Let him get on with his flawed proposals and try not to laugh too much when the ice cream ends up on the floor

6. Husband can jolly well learn to spend more time with his son

7. Stop risk analysing everything


Has been a rather cathartic day after all!

I was also given the advice from well-meaning friends that I needed to allow Husband to make plans and to make mistakes, mainly where forward planning in childcare is concerned. Well, that's all fine and dandy, except he doesn't ?*^%ing learn from his mistakes! Grrrr. (Sudacrem on the sofa 3, YES THREE, times. It's not hard to put the lid on and put it out of reach of Little Saff's fingers.)


Still, I wouldn't lump into the same category all seemingly lazy husbands who irritate their wives. Their wives may be staying with them b/c they have other redeeming qualities. Mr Saff, for instance, is very forgiving. (Hmm maybe that's something he's learned from making so many mistakes?)


Ironic thing is that although he can destroy our kitchen by making a single cup of tea, from what I can tell about his work (he's a builder) he leaves the clients' houses clean! We have a cleaner who comes to our house once a week, even though we can't really afford it. It saves a lot of arguing. Although tonight, I'm the one in trouble b/c I forgot to pay the gas bill.


I'll be returning to work by summer's end. Then I'll be the main breadwinner. Wonder who will do the extra childcare and forward planning then? Hmm, yes, hmm. Changes ahead.

I often find my husband infuriating and think he isn't doing enough, but now that times are really hard, with 6 mnth old not sleeping and 3 yr old being typically demanding he is really supporting me wonderfully, allowing me to get some sleep and doing ad much housework ad he can manage.

I am a Christian and have found this page particularly helpful

http://momsoffaith.com/2008/12/praying-for-your-husband-is-vital-to-your-marriage/

We did a "job swap" for 3 months and it was absolutely brilliant - at the end of my mat leave Mr Y became a SAHD for 3 months while I went back to work full time. It was great both for our relationship, but also our relationships with the Yaklet (indiviudally and collectively, if that makes any sense at all). I could go on at length about it but I'd bore you all to tears!


Glad you have had a bit of a cathartic day, Ole.

Absolutely not wishing to antagonise but I find the wording in the title of the thread interesting: how much does your partner help you. And sometimes for me this sums up the balance, i.e. the implication that it's my job and my partner should help, rather than a balanced 50:50 partnership.

I agree with Yak: nothing better than a job swap to really understand each other's days. I wish my husband could work more flexibly but in his male-dominated industry there is just no way. Plus he gets paid more than me so it makes sense that I am part-time.

I was feeling pretty happy with our balance but after being away for work for two days I am feeling rather grrrrrr about certain comments made upon my return about how inconvenient it was to do both the drop off and the pick up in the same day (which I do 4 days/week). Although to be fair he loved doing it in terms of our son, just that it made work harder...to which I wandered off upstairs muttering silently before I exploded.

Polly D Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Absolutely not wishing to antagonise but I find

> the wording in the title of the thread

> interesting: how much does your partner help you.

> And sometimes for me this sums up the balance,

> i.e. the implication that it's my job and my

> partner should help, rather than a balanced 50:50

> partnership.

> I agree with Yak: nothing better than a job swap

> to really understand each other's days. I wish my

> husband could work more flexibly but in his

> male-dominated industry there is just no way. Plus

> he gets paid more than me so it makes sense that I

> am part-time.



Really good point re 'help' thing - which is when the 'nagging' accusation comes in when actually we'd all rather not have to manage the family - but have the family manage themselves i.e. equally pointing out things that need fixing urgently.


I really disagree on the 'earning less' thing though. I earn considerable more than my partner but it makes zero difference - it really does. I'm still the manager of everything from financial planning down to what we eat in the evening. As they say, the 70s revolution is still yet to infiltrate the family home.... which goes back to the issue of making sure we're not breeding boys to be like their fathers and continue this frustrating cycle.


It's this unfair balance that's today's glass ceiling for women. They just burn out and give in in the end.

Convex Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Role reversal week = brilliant idea!



haha - except that by Wednesday I was waering OH's trousers as he wasn't up to date on the laundry... and I really, really hate taking the bins out.


Roll on Monday, so I can get back to the chores I know and love (well, love more than his, anyway).

My partner actually did all of the hoovering last weekend because I secretly went on a hoovering strike. I didn't even have to ask but afterwards he was all, 'I did ALL the hoovering on my day off!'. I think it's almost worth doing the cleaning just to avoid him lording it over me about it!!

I am now on a secret toilet-cleaning strike but I don't know how much longer I can hold out for!

What a great thread. My OH is pretty good at taking on household chores, though does need to be asked....anything major and he does it unwillingly though.


The kids and I were away Friday night and all Saturday so I asked him to do the housework: sadly neglected since baby 2 arrived in march. He has done all the housework and the house is looking fab....BUT....he's "tidied" the house by putting things in the loft, giving stuff away to our neighbours, moved furniture and filed away our sons toys (he can't bear the mess of toys everywhere). Now I just wish he hadn't done it, because I won't be able to find anything without hunting round the house for its "new place" which I find infuriating, much of the stuff put up in the loft will need to come down again and my son will spend the next few weeks asking me where x and y toys have gone!! I wouldn't mind but his own possessions still remain shoved into corners of each room...none of his stuff went into the loft or was given away!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I thought that re ULEZ, but actually other places do have similar schemes, eg Bristol. I got caught by this a couple of years ago when Google maps sent me through Bristol en route to somewhere else. Though I did manage to get the fine waived. And other places are apparently going to have them, eg Oxford. As I found when I was considering selling the car in Oxford. Which I think is a very good thing, but not helpful if your car isn't compliant  Also in order to sell it I would presumably have to get it into working order, so I'd have to buy a new battery anyway. I use mostly buses and trains already, for travelling both within and outside London.  That's why I rarely use the car except for transporting bulky/heavy items, or going to places which aren't easy to reach via public transport, or giving people a lift who are not very mobile. The problem with hiring a car to go to a festival, for example,  is that I'd be paying for it to sit in a field for several days. And it would be impossible, or at least very difficult,  to transport a tent and camping equipment there by public transport. Not that I've been to any festivals lately. I think I'm talking myself into keeping the car. I did do sums when ULEZ came in. I've had a Freedom Pass for over fifteen years, gulp 😂
    • We used to have local councillors posting on this forum - are there any who are still members?
    • I've never owned a car in the 25 years I've lived in London.  I would regard it as  a hopeless waste of money  I walk, get public transport and taxis for the rare occasions when public transport won't cut it. Anything large that needs to be transporting to or away from my property - well pretty much all shops deliver and for anything  else  there is always someone who willing do it for a small fee. If I need a car to go somewhere outside of London (you would be surprised at how little this issue occurs) then hire cars exist.
    • Hi, we're in a similar position with our old people carrier and did a look back at our usage and then looked at the costs for car clubs, taxis and car hire costs if we got rid of it. In our case the away trips to family, especially during school holidays, makes it cheaper to keep ours and pay ULEZ (the away trips is the big cost for hiring). We rarely use it for local trips and plan usage to aim for multiple purpose trips. We also share with our neighbours such as moving large items with our people carrier and share the ulez cost. Generally for low use alone it will not make financial sense to buy a newer car. Also, if you have a petrol car check its NOx output amount for ULEZ compliance as TFL wrongly categorised many older cars. Did this for neighbours 2001 car and it's ULEZ compliant when TFL originally said it was not (now fixed) and having the same issue with a 1997 petrol car.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...