Jump to content

Saturday 19th October 2019 - London - if you're not on march, sign the letter


Recommended Posts

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ridgley Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Was we not heard 2016?

>

> Yes, but we were also heard in 1975, when Britain

> voted to remain. Why didn't you accept that vote?

In 1975 the politicians were coming out with lies like ' just imagine, everyone in Europe will be driving cars built in the UK' and no one envisaged that the EU would systematically asset-strip the UK over the years culminating in the EU giving Turkey a massive loan 2 years before the referendum, to take the Ford Transit plant away from Southampton with the loss of 600 jobs- and I daresay loans to set up mills for yarns that used to be spun in Yorkshire and are now spun in Turkey.

Within 3 years of us joining the EEC 2 of my own family lost their dairy farms in Wiltshire because of cheap imports. Then we had the set-aside fiasco which that arch-remainiac Heseltine benefited greatly from I bet....

Not to mention the FoM of hardened criminals and vicious thugs that are now in the UK protected by the ECHR

WE the REAL people have been royally shat upon by the EU

Imagine being on the same side as unc


The mortifying shame of it


?Brenda o neill is the voice of reason?


?Eu has asset stripped the uk? (not uk govts campaigning on free market manifestos to sell off uk assets. You don?t see the French gov being as keen to do the same)

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Brendan O'Neill is a voice of reason in all this-

> still the comments on this topic are so

> predictable



IRA bombing apologist, Bosnian genocide denier, advocating riots, yep, very reasonable...

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Within 3 years of us joining the EEC 2 of my own

> family lost their dairy farms in Wiltshire because

> of cheap imports.


> WE the REAL people have been royally shat upon by

> the EU




good working class REAL owners of huge amounts of land yeah?


you reckon that those people at canning town were disenfranchised landowning farmers too?

Apparently everyone who voted 'leave' knew exactly what they were voting for. And it was definitely the deal only agreed upon yesterday and which hardly anyone has actually read in it's entirety. Unless you're a Faragist in which case it is not brexit. But every single 'leave' voter, knew exactly what they were voting for and it was definitely the same thing... which may change massively by the end of the transition period, several years from now.

Brexit: Sign our letter from the people to the powerful demanding Final Say referendum


Follow the link below to tell your MP that you want the Final Say on Brexit


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/letter-a9161701.html


Link:https://www.peoples-vote.uk/letter

Dairy farms - cheap imports? WTF that is about? I am sure that last time I looked all fresh milk was from the UK and there was still masses of English Cheddar for sale. The scare about French UHT evaporated with tinned milk in the early 80s. But of course when we leave the EU Canadian, NZ and Aussie Cheddar will return to the supermarkets. There may be an argument on guaranteed commodity prices, subsidies and the loss of the Milk Marketing Board. And in latter years the strength of the supermarkets (price controls and restriction of trading anyone?). We'll leave the latter to the history books but saying that farmers went out of business all due to the EEC is rather simplistic. Right, now onto the Gulf War.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brendan O'Neill is a voice of reason in all this- still the comments on this topic are so

> predictable


Would that be the same Brendan O'Neill who called on leavers to riot on Politics Live but then had an issue with Extinction Rebellion breaking the law by protesting? Is that all you have Uncleglen? Yet more support for hypocrisy over balanced debate?

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Brendan O'Neill is a voice of reason in all

> this- still the comments on this topic are so

> > predictable

>

> Would that be the same Brendan O'Neill who called

> on leavers to riot on Politics Live but then had

> an issue with Extinction Rebellion breaking the

> law by protesting? Is that all you have Uncleglen?

> Yet more support for hypocrisy over balanced

> debate?


Lots of moans that Mogg & Sixtus took a bit of abuse now.


I don't approve but it wasn't that much compared to what some have gone through.

Mogg was heckled. Not pleasant no, but no-one was tanked up, throwing bottles and cans,or trying to fight with Police. Even saw a few Nazi salutes at the last remain rally, from a DFLA pro-Brexit counter protest. Not that any of those far right hooligans represent leave voters either. Half of them didn't even vote in the referendum, including their muppet figurehead, Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. No doubt they will all turn up for the pro Brexit rally on October 31st though. No doubt there will be arrests.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...