Jump to content

112 dulwich village dental surgery beware


Dulwich handy

Recommended Posts

Following more than few phone calls to local dentist I have found an appointment with

Katherine

At 112 Dulwich village

Over the phone I've asked a nurse how much would it cost to extract a tooth ...

Nurse said she didn't know

(First alarm bell )

I've received a phone call from the "surgeon"

Who assured me that the extraction will take place there (As I was in serious pain)

This is when I found out the cost - ?65 per visit

(Second alarm bell As I have specifically asked if she will extract the bad tooth twice before And she said yes unless there is complication so fair play I said ok)

Came in

Sat down in the chair

And been told that I need to stop smoking

And brush my teeth

(I have not got a single filling or a bad tooth at the age of 26)

She then said that she will brush my teeth and give me some spooky unprnouncable solution to help ease the pain while she will refer me to the dentist

Will help

(Wtf - Strike 3)

...

I wore my confused face for a moment before I realised that I was offered a cosmetic procedure and lesson of brushing instead of what I actually booked my appointment for ...

I did say that I've asked her to remove my tooth

she then said that she will clean them up for me and show me how to do it

(so I will not have trouble in the future)

Then she will refer me to a (REAL) dentist

Who will assess me

(What ?!!!

At ?65 i get my my teeth cleaned and get to know who can help ?!

I know who can

A dentist

I though that dental surgery is actually a place where I can find a dentist not a tooth brush instructor)

I HAVE ASKED

can you just pull out that tooth

As we agreed over the phone as im in pain !

She then said she doesn't know how to do extraction and yet asked for ?65 so I can come

And be hustled by someone who is pretending to be qualified but it isn't

"Dental surgery" what does it mean ?

Had it done elsewhere

1 injection

No Bullshit

10 min

No pain

?40

Done !

Avoid

Avoid

Avoid 112 dulwich village dental surgery

20 MIN ALL TOGETHER

WHERE 30MIN LATER AT 112 DULWICH VILLAGE

Long story short

Hi do you take new patients ?

-Yes

It's an emergency I need my back tooth extracted, can you help ?

-Yes

How much ?

-?65

Ok, when ?

-today 4.15

Came Sat down been charged ?65 for extraction that she didn't know how to do ...

Why say yes ?

Why invite me over?

Why say I do it?

Why charge if I can't do it?

Really

We are not fools

Obviously not all of us

I'm not

Mahoody Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?65 for a private hygienist is good value. Mine

> costs ?85 per 30min visit.

>

> I'm way over 26 and see the hygienist every 3

> months. I consider it money worth spent.



I've asked for extraction

Not a hygenist

Please read up

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • That's the milquetoast triangulation that's delivered so much electoral success to the Lib Dems locally and nationally! 🤣
    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...